I was a witness (more or less) to the TRIAL of Tony Blair, aka the Iraq Inquiry

by

Ban Blair-Baiting

GoPetitionComment at end

30th January, 2010

ON A GREY DAY IN LONDON THE POLITICAL SUPERSTAR SHONE

Unfortunately I didn’t get a ticket for the actual inquisition, interrogation, court witness hearing room, but in the Additional Viewing Facility downstairs, interestingly, if not co-incidentally named the Churchill Auditorium.

I received a ticket to the 2:00pm session. We were all provided with a personally named and numbered sticker in order to permit us to watch the proceedings on a large screen.  The 700 seats allocated were not all taken. Many with tickets had obviously decided not to attend unless they could actually see the man in the flesh.  I had even considered that course of (in)action myself.  In the end I’m glad I went. I heard various estimates of the turn-out being between 450 and 550.  My guess is the upper end of that.

Not a séance or boredom allowing him to nod off momentarily. But I didn't want to take too many pictures in case the shaking head tic tic ladies in front disapproved. (Tony Blair on-screen during the afternoon session of the Iraq Inquiry, 29th January, 2010.) If you use this picture, please link back to here. It's my camera, after all!

CIVILISED BEHAVIOUR FROM THE LIBERAL TENDENCY

The audience in this particular session were quiet, mostly middle-class, middle-aged and well-behaved. A little like a Liberal Democrat debate where policies are hammered out earnestly after much forensic detail in the full expectation that they will never have to be implemented.  I heard from someone who attended the morning session that in that earlier session in the Additional Viewing room one man stood up in disgust and loudly proclaimed that he couldn’t listen to “any more of this”. It seems he was told by others around to behave or go, so he exited.  Civilised behaviour requiring actual listening was clearly expecting too much.

THE SHAKING-HEAD TIC

Nothing like this happened, within my view in any case, at the afternoon session. But in front of me sat two grey-haired  ladies of the shaking-head tendency. I think there may have been a younger version of the same variety a few seats from me. From the ladies in front each head-shake was accompanied by a sigh, an exchange of knowing, raised eyebrow glances,  rolling eyes and a ‘tch-tch’, one in American English. WOW! They’ll come any distance to watch a good lynching of a western politician.  I spotted no foot-of-the-gallows knitting, though.

‘CHEERS’ SAID THE SOBER PANEL

Even before the screen went live, we all knew it was about to start by the familiar clinking of glasses and some burbling, gurgling noises. No, the panel were not toasting the sudden croaking of their prize suspect witness before their eyes, thus conveniently robbing them of the need to find him “guilty/not guilty as charged/not charged.” They were pouring the customary glasses of water.

And then HE arrived. Mr Blair made his entrance after several seconds of unknowable expectation and a searching sideways glance by the chairman – was he there? had he done a runner? He made his entrance, in his own time, aware as ever of impressions. HE was not awaiting the judges panel.  He looked smart as always in a dark blue suit and a dark red tie. He was serious, as was to be expected, possibly slightly apprehensive, as too would be expected. But I did not notice the shaking hands referred to by some reporting on the morning session. He was the lucid and eloquent Blair we all came to love/hate (delete as necessary) and seemed ready to take it all in his capable stride.

There are several video clips online of sections of his entire day’s evidence sessions. All six hours of video and transcript are here at The Iraq Inquiry website. Don’t take my word for it, or the press’s choice clips.  Go there and see for yourself.

[Aside: Can you imagine Saddam Hussein being expected to answer questions like this? Ahmadinejad, Putin or Russia’s  present president? Mugabe? The Chinese leadership? Me neither. Although I do not agree with this fifth Inquiry in principle, because it will never satisfy the unsatisfiable, we should be proud that we have questioned our former Prime Minister in public like this and will even do so with the present prime minister before many weeks have passed. I’m quite keen on having the Conservative Party answer questions too, and the anti-Iraq war Liberal Democrats. Oh – and the press.]

THE ‘CIVIL RIGHTS ROBBER’ ANSWERS FOR HIS DECISIONS

Yesterday was about the top man in Britain at the time of the Iraq decisions answering questions for a whole day. I repeat – for that in this open, western democracy we should be extremely proud. It looks like Tony Blair did not quite manage, as has been suggested by civil righters, to wrap us all mute in a police state after all. (Tch…tch… knowing head shake, rolling eyes… another ‘failure’.)

Former Prime Minister Tony Blair Friday Jan. 29, 2010 testifying to Britain's Iraq Inquiry. Blair said that Saddam Hussein didn't become a bigger threat after Sept. 11, but said his perception of the risk posed by terrorists acquiring weapons of mass destruction was dramatically changed by the attacks. (AP Photo/APTN) (AP)

Picture above from the Washington Post

When I first arrived at Westminster it was raining lightly.  A helicopter flew past Big Ben and hovered in various spots. This is only a few hundred yards/metres from the Queen Elizabeth II Centre.  It seems they were monitoring the millions, thousands … er hundred or two protestors who were bellowing to themselves “Tony Blair, go to Jail”. I know they were addressing one another because several policemen I asked said they weren’t listening. Those poor servants of peace and “Stop the War” demos were the only ones around in any number who were forced to hear.

‘Listening’… well, that’s another matter.

Big Ben, 8:34am, 29th January 2010, as I arrived at the Iraq Inquiry for Tony Blair's evidence. For a moment I wondered if he was in the helicopter. But, no. It turned out he'd been at the venue already for more than an hour. You have to be up early ...

‘B.LIAR’ YELPED THE B***** LIARS

So, through the light London drizzle I wandered across to the Queen Elizabeth II conference centre, which is opposite Westminster  Cathedral and a few hundred yards from the Palace of Westminster – The Houses of Parliament. The yellow-jacketed police were the first into my view. Then I heard the mega-phoned voices. Not until virtually standing opposite did I spot the Ban the Bombers, gathered to the left of the venue. My guess is at most two hundred, perhaps even half of that. Their banners and placards spread their presence in a distorted way, which is appropriate, given their distorted message.

NO LYNCHING OPPORTUNITY HERE – NOTHING TO SEE – MOVE ON

The barrier around the green stopped anyone without a ticket for the relevant session from entering the entire area immediately in front of the venue. So the Blair jailers were forced to set up their stalls on the pavement in front or to one side of the venue, set aside for them. The police were evidently not expecting thousands.  The police were right. I passed several armed policemen but they seemed to be chatting about other things, football, snooker or tennis perhaps, rather than about anything as challenging as preventing the hanging of a politician from a nearby tree.

The green in front of the centre on which they originally wanted to perform had been banned to these dwindling numbers of the righteous. Easy to see why. The press were there in numbers, many under  canopies to do their interviews. The Stop The War warriors had complained as though there was no real reason for their refused permission apart from protecting Tony Blair from their unwelcome screaming and yelling.  As so often before, they got it wrong. That was simply the only place near the venue capable of serving the presence of the world’s press.

INDEFATIGABILITY SILENCED?

As I stood in the queue to enter for the afternoon session I am sure I heard a voice I’d have preferred not to hear – ‘Gorgeous George’.  But oddly enough, and I don’t know why, he had only spoken a dozen words before the speaker went silent. What!!? I worried myself  sick for all of two seconds. Had someone shot him? Or arrested him in the name of peace and right and honesty and integrity an’ all that? I still haven’t worked out why George Galloway stopped talking. It’s never been known before.

Just had it confirmed over at Rentoul’s that I was right about Gorgeous George. He was there. And here’s the proof.

Indefatigability himself, Gorgeous George speaks to the millions, sorry, thousands, oh, I mean dozens... gathered outside the 'gallows' in Westminster. Tony Blair is inside, pleading for his life. Er, not.

I didn’t hang around the venue while the morning session was on, preferring to watch TV coverage in a local hostelry than to watch the Stop Gang stopping nothing, not even the traffic.

THE MASTER’S VOICE

The staff at the pub off Smith Square were very kind and specially for me found the controls for their little-used TV set.  I probably irritated many late morning drinkers as they had to listen to politics in the background. Still, by the time I had to leave quite a few of them were tuning in to The Master’s performance, with him or not politically. He still has not lost that ability to gently command attention, again, with him or not. A rare quality in a politician and something we allowed ourselves to lose so carelessly, not so long ago.


RELATED

Go here to Julie’s to read significant items from Tony Blair’s morning session evidence. You will read none of the bias, opining or cherry-picking we get from our blessed press. Only direct quotes from Mr Blair and the panel. Links there too to the Iraq Inquiry website and the full transcript.

At the Iranian state-sponsored PRESS TV (a George Galloway employer) this bastion of freedom, justice and democracy has its own take on the Inquiry hearing of Tony Blair. I expect they are thinking of doing the same thing with Ahmadinejad and the Supreme Leader.

Read more in the next post on Tony Blair’s afternoon session which I attended, with more pictures of the external goings-on.



About these ads

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “I was a witness (more or less) to the TRIAL of Tony Blair, aka the Iraq Inquiry”

  1. Quietzapple Says:

    Well done for attending. Blair did well in the morning imho, when I was able to watch.He was nervous for a while.

    It seems to me that he did very well, and that people are better informed on the whole than formerly.

    Re your aside, Saddam was tried twice and then hanged.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Saddam_Hussein

    Let us hope God shows him the mercy with which, in life, he was so unfamiliar.

    • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

      Hi QZ – just noticed your comment and that I hadn’t replied. It was worth attending the event in the end.

      Well, if he was nervous in the morning that’s to be expected. He is human after all – more or less.

      I didn’t think I’d mentioned Saddam, btw.

  2. Tony Blair asks at the Iraq Inquiry: “Who is killing them?” « Tony Blair Says:

    […] Tony Blair « I was a witness (more or less) to the TRIAL of Tony Blair, aka the Iraq Inquiry […]

  3. Rentoul to BBC on Iraq Inquiry – “No, it’s NOT a trial”. (I was witness to this too!) « Tony Blair Says:

    […] Friday night, after the hanging, I spent some time with John Rentoul in his office at Westminster in the Houses of […]

  4. Monbiot defends his widely mocked “Arrest Blair” campaign « Tony Blair Says:

    […] I DO wish I’d been in the Inquiry room on Friday when Mr Blair spoke instead of just in the Additional Viewing room. I may well have been the only one, but I’d have applauded […]

  5. Middle East peace? They’re ALL on Blair’s page now, except the British press « Tony Blair Says:

    […] One, Blair was asked in Huck Part 1 about his evidence at the Iraq Inquiry. His thoughts on Iran had already been cherry-picked  by his opponents and enemies in order to show his ‘warmongering instincts‘ or/and his distraction technique, presumably from his own discomfort. I have to report not noticing any real discomfort as I watched the afternoon session of the Inquiry. […]

  6. ‘Liddle Against the War’ (and Chilcot) – via Rentoul « Tony Blair Says:

    […] http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/i-was-a-witness-more-or-less-to-the-trial-of-tony… […]

  7. The Conspiracy of Silence on the Ban Blair-Baiting Campaign « Tony Blair Says:

    […] The ad has also been uploaded to YouTube by Julie, with the background ALL-KNOWING chants of the protestors outside the Iraq Inquiry on 29th January when Mr Blair appeared. I attended the afternoon session on that day if you’d like to see my report here. […]

  8. So, who said British journalists aren’t nuts? « Tony Blair Says:

    […] who thought that January 29th at Chilcot was “Tony Blair’s TRIAL”. I kid you not! I was there. And I met one of the journalists who just goes to prove that all generalisations are dangerous, […]

  9. Every (£100) breath Tony Blair takes – the stalking press are watching « Tony Blair Says:

    […] I was a witness (more or less) to the TRIAL of Tony Blair, aka the Iraq Inquiry […]

  10. Tony Blair, YouTube video – BBC, Iraq Inquiry « Tony Blair Says:

    […] I was there, by the way, if you’d like to read my report of the day: I was a witness (more or less) to the TRIAL of Tony Blair, aka the Iraq Inquiry […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s