Archive for May, 2010

‘Al-Qaeda ringleader’ in UK wins appeal against deportation. ConDems government will not appeal

May 18, 2010
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. A recent comment “Look what’s happened to Labour without Blair. You left wing ultra scum should be ashamed of yourselves letting the Tories back in!”
  • Comment at end

    18th May 2010

    WANDER FREELY AMONG US BRITS, DEAR TERRORISTS

    WE WOULDN’T WANT ANYONE TO HURT YOU IN NASTY PAKISTAN

    A special immigration court said Abid Naseer was an al-Qaeda operative - but could not be deported because he faced torture or death back home in Pakistan. MI5 alleged Abid Naseer wrote coded e-mails to an al-Qaeda member. Another student Ahmad Faraz Khan, also 23, won his appeal on similar grounds.

    Our new ‘government’ has already made one of its most noteworthy decisions.  One, I sincerely hope we will retain in our memory.

    The new Home Secretary, Theresa May (and minister for women and equality), has decided that the government will NOT appeal, repeat NOT appeal against this outrageous decision. Opinion is that if Alan Johnson had still been Home Secretary today HE would have appealed. But THIS government won’t.

    Afraid of upsetting Muslims? CRAZY, if that is the case. Most Muslims would love to see this sort banished from Britain. I know exactly who and what they are afraid of.  The clue is in their new government party name.

    This Liberal/Conservative government (ConDems) will not appeal. To appeal would be to frighten the LibDem, pro-human rights horses.

    By the way, the rationale that decrees that SOME of these people have LOST (go here) their appeals on human rights grounds and have been returned to Pakistan, and yet SOME of them have beaten our easily manipulated legal system, escapes me.

    PLEASE EXPLAIN.

    As the new parliament meets for the first time today, remember this:

    Theresa May is the new Home Secretary and minister for women and equality.

    THE FIRST ACT OF THE HOME SECRETARY WAS TO ALLOW AN AL QAEDA LEADER TO REMAIN IN BRITAIN.

    WHY? IN CASE HE IS TORTURED WHEN HE RETURNS TO PAKISTAN!

    Tied so tightly into their new Lib Dem partnership the Conservatives will not even attempt to alter the Human Rights Act as it is applied in Britain, even though WE ALL KNOW it needs to be revisited, and some wish it to be scrapped altogether. But to look at this, or anything connected fundamentally with the EU, would be to raise the spectre of viscerally held, insoluble differences between the slavish Human Rights protectors – the Lib Dems and the once conservative and EU-cool Tories.

    To bring the EU itself into controversial focus? We can’t have that now, can we?

    Am I alone in suggesting this? –

    Those who are found guilty of attempting terrorist acts or of planning, conniving or inciting others  to do so must be exempted from human rights laws protection.

    Behaviour that is inhuman is enough for most right-minded people across the political spectrum to say – ‘human rights? You’ve lost the right’.

    BBC: ‘Al-Qaeda ringleader’ wins appeal against deportation

    The alleged leader of an al-Qaeda plot to bomb targets in north west England has won his appeal against deportation.

    A special immigration court said Abid Naseer was an al-Qaeda operative – but could not be deported because he faced torture or death back home in Pakistan.

    Naseer, 23, was one of 10 Pakistani students arrested last April as part of a massive counter terrorism operation in Liverpool and Manchester.

    Another student Ahmad Faraz Khan, also 23, won his appeal on similar grounds.

    Lawyers for the new home secretary, Theresa May, said they would not be appealing against the ruling, handed down by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission.

    MI5 evidence

    The security services believed the men were planning to attack within days of their arrest, but neither student was charged.

    A third man, Shoaib Khan, 31, who is already back in Pakistan, was cleared of any involvement in terrorism.

    The ruling affectively means that MI5′s case against two of the men has been supported by the courts even though neither of them were ever charged with a criminal offence.

    11 students arrested in daytime raids. Lawyers for the new home secretary, Theresa May, said they would not be appealing against the ruling, handed down by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission.

    Two other men also arrested in the raids who are now back in Pakistan – Abdul Wahab Khan, 27, and Tariq Ur Rehman, 38, – lost their deportation appeals. (Back to top)

    The controversial affair began last April when the Metropolitan Police’s then head of counter-terrorism, Assistant Commissioner Bob Quick, accidentally revealed details of the investigation.

    Mr Quick resigned after he was photographed with clearly visible secret documents outside Number 10 Downing Street.

    Police brought their operation forward and raided a series of locations across Liverpool, Manchester and Lancashire, eventually detaining 11 men.

    Ten of them were students from Pakistan, who were all either close friends or loosely known to each other.

    Former prime minister Gordon Brown said at the time that the security services were “dealing with a very big terrorist plot”.

    But no explosives were found and all of the men were released without charge after two weeks.

    They were immediately detained again under immigration laws after the then home secretary sought their deportation, saying they were still a threat to national security.

    In his own report into the investigation, Lord Carlile, the terrorism laws watchdog, said that none of the arrests had been made “on a full evidential foundation” but that officers had moved in because they feared for public safety.

    He said the police were “probably right” to launch their operation – with arrests at gun-points in public places – but added that detectives should have sought the advice of specialist prosecutors much earlier.


    MY THOUGHTS: Interesting how the Labour-appointed terrorism laws watchdog,  Lord Carlile (who happens to be a Liberal Democrat) seems to blame the police for this failure.

    RELATED

    From Harry’s Place – ‘Great News for Al Qaeda in the United Kingdom’



    Free Hit Counter


    OK. I DID tell you so… Blairless Labour lost it

    May 17, 2010
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. A recent comment “Look what’s happened to Labour without Blair. You left wing ultra scum should be ashamed of yourselves letting the Tories back in!”
  • Comment at end

    17th May 2010

    Tweeted this post here – http://twitter.com/blairsupporter

    John Burton, Blair’s former agent: “After his farewell speech at Trimdon Labour Club in May, 2007, Tony told me he knew he would have been able to deal with Conservative leader David Cameron at the next General Election, but he didn’t believe Gordon would have it in him.”

    Have you been checking back here to see if I’ve said “I told you so”? It felt sort of surplus to requirements. And I’m not the gloating type.

    But I have noticed very few of our beloved press mentioning the missing factor in recent Labour party/government history. No mention of the unmentionable.  Wonder why?  So, to compensate for their omissions, and especially for Labour voters or Blair supporters (not mutually exclusive, nor necessarily the same thing)  -

    I TOLD YOU SO

    The Milibandians (David – ‘Blairite’ who is now moving on from NewLabour) of either MiliBRAND (Ed – ‘Brownite’ who wants to win back Blair voters!?) can go on all they like in their confused and confusing way about New Labour, Labour, Old Labour, Next Labour, Neo-New Labour, Progressive Labour, Labour Plus+Plus A Bit More etc.

    Ed Miliband - not the Blairite that his brother David is/was, conversely wants to reconnect with those who voted for Tony Blair. Those who were lost to AND by Gordon Brown. Confused? Them too.

    It won’t detract from my conviction that if Tony Blair had still been running things on his birthday, which just happened to be May 6th (and I DID warn Gordon), they would have been washing down the remainder of his 57th birthday cake with champagne on the evening of May 7th in Number 10 Downing Street.

    Instead, 57 Lib Dems are keeping the Cameroons & themselves in power, and washed-up Labour is washing down their party.

    So, in case you were on the moon last week and missed it, what happened in the general unelection?

    • Labour lost the election.
    • The Conservatives failed to win the election.
    • The Liberal Democrats did worse for seats (though less than 1% better for votes than they did in 2005, when Blair won despite the press-unpopular Iraq war fallout.)

    Then what happened?

    • Mr Cameron realised his minority government would collapse after a short time, because the Lib Dems & Labour would vote it down at some stage. (Yes, I did say the Lib Dems.)

    Then what happened?

    Cable, right, thinks: 'I don't agree with Nick'.

    Vince Cable, right, thinks: 'I don't agree with Nick'.

    Two former Lib Dem leaders, Paddy Ashdown and Charles Kennedy SAY 'I don't agree with you, Nick'

    Charles Kennedy says, pointedly, 'You're an unprincipled ba**ard, Nick'

    Back to where I was. The bit about not liking to tell you I TOLD you so -

    I TOLD YOU SO -

    Examples from the last four years  of my know-it-all wisdom. I could write a book; probably have.

    And when personality issues were raise – emotional intelligence, temperament etc -

    When serious bullying allegations were mentioned

    I TOLD you, more than once-

    When the lack of intestinal fortitude in the Labour party was highlighted AGAIN, even this year -

    Even when others told you, you didn’t seem to take it seriously -

  • May 2009 – Nick Cohen’s devastating exposé of “Fear & Filth at Brown’s Number 10″
  • May 2009 – HELP! TONY!! Yell Labour “defectors” to the Lib Dems. The Return of THE BLAIR?
  • June 2009 – The Mirror & A PANICKING Routledge: “HELP, TONY! GORDON needs You!
  • In July 2009 on Blair’s business acumen – Slowe – fast to praise Blair, criticise Brown
  • In August 2009 – Obama (TOLD YOU) on Cameron- ‘No substance’; Brown- ‘No sizzle’; Blair- ‘Sizzle & Substance’
  • And in December 2009 a former Blair cabinet minister tried to tell you – The ‘Hutton’ Report: “Brown would be a f**king disaster as PM”
  • Just before the election Oliver Kamm explained the reason he’d vote Labour, regardless of the “feeble” & “incompetent” Brown
  • Two weeks before the election I tried to let you know that there were 4 fighters in the ring, not just 3 – The Big Fight: A four-hander in Bristol. Brown Vs Cameron Vs Clegg Vs WHO?
  • I hate to go on, but there have been so many clues -

  • Time Calls Time on the Time-Server Brown
  • Is Brown’s PR ALL PR? Remember OMF & TFM?
  • Blair on Brown’s “Darkness” & “Lies”. No denial yet.
  • June 2009 – Mandelson e-mail: on (lacking) “X-Factor” Brown (& Rumours of Blair’s Prognosis)
  • Will The Labour Women Finish Off Brown?
  • Brown Must Go: 70 (invisible) signatories sought
  • Will Blair (the disappeared) Return to Save Labour?
  • February 2009 – Chris Mullin Diary: Folding Deckchairs on Brown’s Sinking Ship
  • 31st May 2009 – Brown Killed New Labour – Well, we TOLD you, didn’t we?
  • May, 2009 – Is Another (Blairite) Plot to Unseat Brown in the Offing?
  • 3rd June 2009 – Brown’s Government: Collapsing BEFORE Your Very Vote
  • All Change in Britain too: Brown resuscitates the cold and the dead
  • Brown To Go – Now or Soon, say MPs
  • Coup … or … How To Kill The Leader Without Anyone Getting Blamed
  • May, 2009 – Blair on Brown & dealing with Cameron, & this from Blair’s constituency agent, John Burton -

    Excerpt:

    “On September 6, 2006, the headlines – about an acrimonious meeting between Blair and Brown over when Tony would step down – made grim reading. He was staring down the barrel of a shotgun, and the finger on the trigger was Gordon’s.

    Ten years of brooding had boiled over. His message was blunt: ‘Do as I say, or you’ll be bundled from office.’

    The next day, Tony announced he’d stand down within a year. Then, after all the threats and the shouting, Gordon and his allies got cold feet and denied plotting a coup.

    They had chipped away at Tony for years, but nothing matched this ridiculous behaviour – trying to oust a constitutionally elected Prime Minister. If it had happened in a Third World country, politicians worldwide would have condemned it.

    After his farewell speech at Trimdon Labour Club in May, 2007, Tony told me he knew he would have been able to deal with Conservative leader David Cameron at the next General Election, but he didn’t believe Gordon would have it in him.” (MY BOLDING)

    AND NEW NEW LABOUR/NEXT LABOUR /BLAIRLESS/BROWNLESS LABOUR OR WHATEVER THE HELL IT IS? So far, so uninspiring.

    Excerpt: “New Labour was a reaction to the 1980s but it was trapped by the 1980s. Anyone who thinks that the future is about re-creating New Labour is wrong. I think we’ve got to use this period to decisively break with that. What I’m interested in is Next Labour.”

    FGS. Gimme a break.

    This video is from the YouTube Channel of Tom Harris MP (and proud Blairite, whatever THAT is/was.)

    Tom Harris’s blog – “And another thing…” (sounds like me.)

    Next?

    By the way, shortly before the polls closed on May 6th, and NONE of us had seen the exit poll pointing to a hung parliament I re-ran this – Death of glue-less, clueless Labour & Wikipedia entry 2050

    P.S. I TOLD YOU SO




    Free Hit Counter


    The ‘all things to all men’ ConDem leadership: CamClegg Morphed

    May 17, 2010
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. A recent comment Thank you Tony Blair for all you have done to make this World, your country and mine safer. Thank you for having the courage to make the hard decisions when it would have been more expedient and less derisive not to. Thank you for being more like Mr Churchill than Mr Chamberlain. Most importantly thank you for serving your country when most of us just stand by and complain.
  • Comment at end

    17th May 2010

    CAMERON = CLEGG, IN 3 EASY STEPS

    They should have stopped at the 3rd incarnation (2nd from right). It looks most like the man they are mimicking.

    Now where have I seen this potograph before? Oh, I know -

    Before long Mr Blair's picture and all the rest on the flight of stairs in Number 10, will be moved down. To be replaced by that of Mr Brown. I bet Mr Cameron can hardly wait.

    I don’t care what Mr Cameron chooses to call himself, though I notice many Conservatives do. But I will continue to describe his coalition as the ‘ConDems‘, not the ‘Liberal Conservatives’  as he does. The latter is bad enough if you’re not one. But the former is more apt, given that we are being conned out of our democracy, left right and centre. [See David Davis, Tory MP and Melanie Phillips.]

    LABOUR? NEXT?

    With the leftwing  Will Hutton already enlisted, and Labour’s Frank Field dismissing his sign-up as ConDem “spin”, David Cameron’s Big Blairite tent seems to have ONE big name missing.

    Now, I wonder? Any chance? Stranger things have happened.

    On the other hand he could really shake things up, as I wondered here in February 2009 -  Is Tony Blair About To Launch a NEW Political Party?

    Now that David Miliband, in an attempt to shake off recent differences at the top, has insisted that - “The Blair-Brown era is over. New Labour is not new any more. New Labour did fantastic things for the country but what counts is next Labour” - it is right now up to Cameron, Clegg and their merry band to carry on regardless with Blairism.

    And they will. Mark my words.

    ‘NEXT’ Labour, with its intrinsic downplaying of the recent past, is bound to dress to the Left. And the Left is the place for losers in this country.




    Free Hit Counter


    Hague to Clinton: “Yes, of course we support Blair’s intervention policies”

    May 17, 2010
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. A recent comment Thank you Tony Blair for all you have done to make this World, your country and mine safer. Thank you for having the courage to make the hard decisions when it would have been more expedient and less derisive not to. Thank you for being more like Mr Churchill than Mr Chamberlain. Most importantly thank you for serving your country when most of us just stand by and complain.
  • Comment at end

    17th May 2010

    PRINCIPLES … IN PICTURES

    “Let me explain, Hillary – “

    [Original photograph by Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA, can be seen at Rentoul's.]

    Asked if Britain would now pull back from its instinct to intervene where possible in humanitarian crises in poor countries, Hague said, “Would we intervene if we thought another Rwanda was happening? Yes, we would. Would we intervene if we saw another Balkan war unfolding? Yes, we would.”

    Perhaps Hillary then asked Hague -
    Too difficult for the straight-talking Mr Hague?

    Now – close your mouth  please Hillary.

    (More follows from Normblog)

    Foreign policy prospects

    Britain’s new foreign secretary William Hague was in Washington last week:

    On foreign policy, it was fascinating to listen to the Foreign Secretary tic through the usual issue sets – Iran, Afghanistan, Europe, global development, humanitarian intervention, etc. – and to discover that there is hardly any distance between his coalition’s views and that of the Labour government it is succeeding…

    Hague pointed out that, in opposition, his party had supported every one of Tony Blair’s major military interventions abroad, whether they were motivated entirely by humanitarianism or by more traditional security arguments – in Sierra Leone, in Kosovo, in Bosnia, in Afghanistan, and in Iraq. (The Liberal Democrats, his coalition partners, were the only British political party to oppose the Iraq invasion.)

    Asked if Britain would now pull back from its instinct to intervene where possible in humanitarian crises in poor countries, Hague said, “Would we intervene if we thought another Rwanda was happening? Yes, we would. Would we intervene if we saw another Balkan war unfolding? Yes, we would.”

    I think of the sort of person who went on the anti-war march of 15 February 2003 and periodically writes to the Guardian to complain of how undemocratic it is that they weren’t listened to. Their voice seems, also, not to have carried across the intervening seven years, to secure them a foreign secretary representing their views. Still, they might be able to rely on the Liberal Democrats doing the business within that coalition. We must wait and see. (Via.)

    Thanks to John Rentoul, by way of Normblog, by way of Bobbie Johnson @ Twitter, back to the source – NewYorker




    Free Hit Counter


    Eternal damnation & the annihilation of the swell (Labour) party

    May 15, 2010
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. A recent comment Thank you Tony Blair for all you have done to make this World, your country and mine safer. Thank you for having the courage to make the hard decisions when it would have been more expedient and less derisive not to. Thank you for being more like Mr Churchill than Mr Chamberlain. Most importantly thank you for serving your country when most of us just stand by and complain.
  • Comment at end

    15th May 2010

    IS LABOUR FADING INTO THE WILDERNESS?

    In one fell swoop or even swell foop, the Labour party seems to have disappeared.

    What a Swell party this is

    Oh yes I know Episode 2 of The Brothers is about to hit a screen near you.  And yes, I realise that the once favourite Lib Dem Uncle Vince Cable was actually keener on coalescing with Labour than with the (hated) Tories.

    But all I have so far heard or read in the future Labour leadership tip-toeing proves to me what I have always said from the start:

    the Labour party, as a political force, does NOT get what Blair (and even Brown more subtly) was all about.

    But SOME got it. David Cameron has performed his best Blairite move yet; possessing the middle ground. Boosted by the Lib Dems, to the Left, yes Left of Labour, Cameron’s position is to spread his little band of merry ConDems right across New Labour territory. So, taking the Tory bait as Cameron knew the Blairless wonders would, we have most of the expected Labour leadership contenders appealing to their core vote on the Old Labour Left.

    The Miliband David is not doing that, quite. Well, only in the way Brown didn’t do it; subtly. But his more instinctively left-aligned brother Ed will see to it that neither of them wins. Just to keep Mum mum.

    And so Labour may find itself with a Balls-up leadership.

    After the Labour party’s annihilation at, sorry, AFTER the election, a kind of quiet civil war seems to have broken out within its ranks. They’re going to have a de-briefing, a post-mortem even. So that’s all right then. They can pronounce that the rumour is true.

    New Labour… Labour… really is a dead parrot.

    LABOUR HAS ONLY ITSELF TO BLAME

    Blair’s last words to his party at the conference in September 2006:

    Tony Blair speaks to his party conference in his last Leader's Speech, September 2006

    Tony Blair speaks to his party conference in his last Leader's Speech, September 2006

    “I don’t want to be the Labour Leader who won 3 successive elections. I want to be the first Labour Leader to win 3 successive elections.

    So, it’s up to you. You take my advice. You don’t take it. Your choice.

    Whatever you do, I’m always with you. Head and heart.

    You’ve given me all I have ever achieved, and all that we’ve achieved, together, for the country.

    Next year I won’t be making this speech. But, in the years to come, wherever I am, whatever I do, I’m with you.

    Wishing you well. Wanting you to win.

    You’re the future now.  Make the most of it.”

    Tony Blair's last address to Parliament, June 2007

    This seems to be the most they could make of it.

    And his last words to the country in the House of Commons, June 2007:

    “That is that. The end.”

    Seems he was right. Again.

    Go here for the rest of that speech:  ‘Last words to the country – June 2007, House of Commons’




    Free Hit Counter


    Dowden seems set to forgive Mugabe. But Blair? Ah well, that’s different

    May 15, 2010
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. A recent comment: “Thank you Tony Blair for all you have done to make this World, your country and mine safer. Thank you for having the courage to make the hard decisions when it would have been more expedient and less derisive not to. Thank you for being more like Mr Churchill than Mr Chamberlain. Most importantly thank you for serving your country when most of us just stand by and complain.
  • Comment at end

    15th May 2010

    Check out the links here and then come back please.

    On the 10 O’clock news on Radio 4 on Friday night I heard this:

    Mugabe clasped my hand and said, “I am tired of this war with Britain.  How can we end it?” I asked what he thought the core of the problem was. The secret land deal believed to have been agreed at the Lancaster House conference of 1979 that led to an independent Zimbabwe? He replied, “No. It was Blair.”

    I expected the speaker, Richard Dowden, to dismiss this out of hand as it deserved. Instead Mr Dowden said this – “I got the impression that, at the age of 86, he genuinely is tired of it.”

    “Genuinely”?

    Mugabe? Two months ago he courted, as only he can “these fools”, the British Conservative party. The reason Mugabe hates Blair so much is that Blair DIDN’T run away. The reason he snuggles up to today’s new British “government” is that they well might. I await the ConDem Africa policy with interest.

    From this Radio4 interview I got the impression that Mr Dowden must be an innocent abroad.  I was wrong. I searched online and found this fuller account of his Mugabe tete-a-tete here. More interestingly still he has this on “corruption”. The “corruption” which bothers him is the so-called British/BAE/ Blair corruption, not the end result of Mugabe’s corruption, as pictured below. (WARNING: GRAPHIC PICTUES)

    The Elim Mission massacre

    June 24 1978 – From the Sunday Mail, Salisbury, Rhodesia – Terry Blocksidge reports: On the night of June 23, 1978, Elim Mission in the then-Rhodesian Eastern Highlands – unarmed men, women and children — was [sic] subjected to the worst massacre of missionaries yet experienced.

    A mother, beaten to death, lay with her young baby. The baby had also been savagely beaten. Their arms stretched out to each other, their hands resting an inch apart. The child’s hand was clenched. The mother had a hand squeezed tightly around her engagement ring, turned into her palm, as she reached for her baby in her dying moments.

    Eight British missionaries and four young children – including a three-week-old baby – were bayoneted to death by terrorists on Rhodesia’s Eastern border on Friday night in the worst massacre of whites since the six-year-old war began. Three of the missionaries were men and the others women.  (most of the women were also raped, and one was mutilated.)

    A sixth woman was stabbed and beaten and left for dead. She staggered 300 m into the freezing Vumba bush to spend the night before being found semi-conscious by security forces yesterday. Despite intensive care in a Salisbury hospital she subsequently died. The gruesome murders, by a group of eight to 10 terrorists, happened at Emmanuel Mission School – 15 km south-east of Umtali and 8 km from the Mozambique border – once used as the Eagle boarding school. The dead, who belonged to the Elim Pentecostal Church, were:

    • Mr. Peter McCann (30), his wife, Sandra (also 30), son Phillip (6) and daughter Joy (5).
    • The Rev. Phillip Evans (29), his wife, Suzan (35), and their daughter Rebecca (4).
    • Mr. Roy Lynn (37), his wife, Joyce (36), and their daughter Pamela Grace. She would have been three weeks old yesterday.
    • Catherine Picken (55) and Elizabeth Wendy Hamilton- White (37).
    • Miss Mary Fisher (28).

    Most of the women had been sexually assaulted, and one mutilated.  Even hardened security men were stunned by the bloody scene and stood around silently. “The quiet is uncanny”, said one. Mr. Brian Chapman, director of the Church in Rhodesia and South Africa, visited the scene yesterday. He said: “We saw no humanity here.”

    The children had been dragged from their beds. Two children were in yellow pyjamas, one with a red dressing gown, and a third in a flowery nightdress. One child had her tiny thumbs clenched in her palms.

    The massacre began shortly before 8.30 p.m. when the white families were forced by the terrorists from their homes and classrooms, and marched to a playing field. Near the sports pavilion, about 400 m from the main school, they were split into groups, then beaten with lengths of wood and logs, and stabbed.  When security forces reached the scene yesterday, the full horror on the cold, mist-and-rain shrouded Vumba mountainside confronted them:

    Nearby, another woman had died from an axe-wound – the weapon still protruded from her shoulder and two men, one with his hands tied behind his back, lay beaten and slashed to death.

    Above pictures and report from Censorbugbear-reports

    A blood-soaked chunk of wood had been dropped near to them. Three children lay in a pitiful huddle, with two women’s bodies next to them. Some had raised their arms to defend themselves from the brutal blows. The reactions of the media in general were predictable, with many newspapers being singularly outspoken. However, this is what was said by the then-US Ambassador to UN , Pastor Andrew Young: “The Patriotic Front (of Robert Mugabe) move around the villages, conduct political seminars and sing songs…’

    In the worst atrocity committed against white civilians in the history of Rhodesia’s six-year war, terrorists of Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe National Liberation Army hacked and battered to death almost the entire white staff and their families at the Elim Pentacostal Mission in the Eastern border mountains.

    Mr. Young was asked a month earlier by the London Times: “Does Mr. Mugabe strike you as a violent man?”

    He replied: “Not at all, he’s a very gentle man. In fact, one of the ironies of the whole struggle is that I can’t imagine Joshua Nkomo, or Robert Mugabe, ever pulling the trigger on a gun to kill anyone. I doubt that they ever have…. The violent people are Smith’s people and hopefully they won’t be around for the new Zimbabwe.”

    Clearly, Dowden is not the only one whose moral compass is whirring out of control. In his recent writings Dowden makes clear where his  sympathies lie. With the African peoples. That he shares with Tony Blair. It’s a great pity and utterly shameful that he doesn’t drop his antipathy towards Tony Blair.

    He needs to point instead to the truly deserving of his disdain. The murderer of children – ROBERT MUGABE.

    From Dowden’s “corruption is the killer that we all ignore comes this gem:

    “Mr Blair called Africa “a scar on the conscience of the world”. Perhaps Tanzania and South Africa are the scars on his conscience. The next time a British minister stands up to denounce corruption in Africa, there will be hollow laughter from the continent. And rightly so.”

    I don’t think so, Mr Dowden. I really don’t think so.

    Of course Mr Dowden has no such facile judgements to make on China’s motives in Africa.  Oh, no. On China, where human rights are as rare as common sense in the British press, he wrote this on November 9th 2009:

    Why Africa welcomes the new colonialism

    Richard Dowden is director of the Royal African Society and author of Africa: Altered States, Ordinary Miracles

    Might I suggest Mr Dowden asks Africans whether, if asked to choose, they’d trust Mugabe or Blair. From “Mugabe will miss Blair at the New Zimbabwe:

    When New Labour was swept into power after a landslide victory in 1997, Blair became the youngest British Prime Minister in 150 years. By that time, Mugabe had been in power since 1980 and had a 17-year head start over his new counterpart. But when the dispute over the land issue erupted between Britain and Zimbabwe, and subsequently the imposition of targeted sanctions against the Zimbabwean leader and his lieutenants, Mugabe failed to use his “experience” constructively. Of late, Mugabe has been boasting about being more qualified to lead the country than his youthful political rivals in the ruling party by virtue of being more experienced.

    While he can bulldoze everyone in Zanu PF to accept that false claim, most Zimbabweans know that his adoption of a scorched earth policy in situations where he should have shown more restraint and foresight has been to the detriment of national interests. Today, most ordinary Zimbabweans struggle to put food on the table while billions of dollars continue to be wasted on pointless propaganda wars such as the one waged against Blair. Mugabe was quoted recently as saying with a straight face and without a hint of irony, that he had never seen a “dictator” like Blair!

    When Blair condemned the battering of opposition leaders and activists by the police in March, Mugabe dismissed his sentiments as “the kicks of a dying horse.”

    It takes truly mad guts for someone who is refusing to pass on the baton after 27 years to take such a dig at a younger leader who is quitting after only 10 years in power. But the question now is, will Blair’s successor, Gordon Brown, become the new target of Mugabe’s vitriol?

    After all, the crisis in Zimbabwe continues to escalate and the President will still need a scapegoat to blame. Blair’s departure presents a challenge to Mugabe and his amateurish propagandists and apologists.

    Somehow, the slogan THE ONLY BLAIR I KNOW IS A BLAIR TOILET doesn’t sit comfortably on Brown. It should be indeed, a sad day for Zanu PF strategists who probably already had truckloads of literature with Blair’s name ready for next year’s election.

    Back to top

    [21 Pics] Gruesome, Gore: Terrorism in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe: Rare Booklet: Anatomy of Terror

    Date Posted: Monday 11-May-2009

    ‘Here is a page you can read which will give you an idea of many terrorist acts for which notphotos [sic] are available. The list below could continue on and on for the next seven years. This is how Robert Mugabe came to power. These were their tactics. Read, and be disgusted.’

    [21 Pics]  Gruesome, Gore: Terrorism in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe: Rare Booklet: Anatomy of  Terror

    Top Photo: 28/10/1973: Mr. Mkambe Chiqueqwete, repeatedly shot by terrorists at his village. Twenty-three cartridge cases of communist origin were found at the scene. Motive unknown. Bottom Photo: 16/04/1974: Four terrorists took Mr. Albert Chigumbuza from his home in the Rusamboarea, accused him of being a "sellout" and shot him 15 times. There was absolutely no connection between Mr. Chigumbuza and the authorities.

    [21 Pics]  Gruesome, Gore: Terrorism in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe: Rare Booklet: Anatomy of  Terror

    17/04/1974: Mr. Chivarenge was the headman of a village. Ten terrorists approached him, accused him of being a "sellout", tied his hands behind his back and shot him. They then shot the 14 cattle which represented the entire village's worldly wealth and then set fire to the village. Mr. Chivarenge had led a blameless life and no motive is apparent.

    [More pictures here at African Crisis]

    RELATED

    Change Zimbabwe – ‘The real victims of Mugabe’s land reform’

    Mugabe will miss Blair Excerpt:

    Today, most ordinary Zimbabweans struggle to put food on the table while billions of dollars continue to be wasted on pointless propaganda wars such as the one waged against Blair. Mugabe was quoted recently as saying with a straight face and without a hint of irony, that he had never seen a “dictator” like Blair!

    When Blair condemned the battering of opposition leaders and activists by the police in March, Mugabe dismissed his sentiments as “the kicks of a dying horse.”

    It takes truly mad guts for someone who is refusing to pass on the baton after 27 years to take such a dig at a younger leader who is quitting after only 10 years in power.

    And from Wikipedia’s land reform:

    Excerpt:

    When Zimbabwe gained independence, 46.5% of the country’s arable land was owned by around 6,000 commercial farmers.[41] Mugabe accepted a “willing buyer, willing seller” plan as part of the Lancaster House Agreement of 1979, among other concessions to the white minority.[42] As part of this agreement, land redistribution was blocked for a period of 10 years.[43]

    In 1997, the new British government led by Tony Blair unilaterally stopped funding the “willing buyer, willing seller” land reform programme on the basis that the initial £44 million allocated under the Thatcher government was used to purchase land for members of the ruling elite rather than landless peasants. Furthermore, Britain’s ruling Labour Party felt no obligation to continue paying white farmers compensation, or in minister Clare Short‘s words, “I should make it clear that we do not accept that Britain has a special responsibility to meet the costs of land purchase in Zimbabwe. We are a new Government from diverse backgrounds without links to former colonial interests. My own origins are Irish and as you know we were colonised not colonisers”.[44]




    Free Hit Counter


    Security Risks: David Cameron PM DENIES. Stephen Timms MP is STABBED

    May 14, 2010
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. A recent comment Thank you Tony Blair for all you have done to make this World, your country and mine safer. Thank you for having the courage to make the hard decisions when it would have been more expedient and less derisive not to. Thank you for being more like Mr Churchill than Mr Chamberlain. Most importantly thank you for serving your country when most of us just stand by and complain.
  • Comment at end

    UPDATE, 18th May: Roshonara Choudhary charged with attempting to murder Labour MP

    14th May 2010

    In one of those curious happenstance juxtapositions, the new PM of Britain seemed not to notice that his position is not as it was last weekend, while another MP feels deeply, knows personally that his isn’t.

    David Cameron said, more or less – I want to sit in London’s traffic like the rest of the peopleI can work from the back of my car while Rome Britain burns. Aren’t I a man of them? The people, that is.

    This Is London – “He [Cameron] is happy to put up with the same type of driving conditions as everyone else.”

    So the happy snappers can snap away to their little hearts’ content. There is no danger to ANY of US in that Mr David Cameron, PM of the ConDems (and the Condemned?) thinks he is in no clear and present danger.  He’s obviously one of us and far too popular to be in any danger.  Remember his hero? T Blair? No-one ever wanted to kill him, did they? No. No-one at all. No, never (see here.)

    Anyway, what about the rest of us?  Those standing around, feeling oh-so-lucky to have spotted the new PM that we whip out our mobile phones. What about us? Are we loved and and protected too, encased in bomb- and bullet-proof safety?

    Nope. Ahh, but he’ll learn. Hopefully the easy way. Without wiping out too many voters.

    ‘Sitting Duck’ PM: Security fears as David Cameron gets trapped in traffic

    Excerpt (source here)

    “David Cameron has raised fears for his security by axing the police outriders who used to speed the prime ministerial car through traffic, the Evening Standard can reveal. He has decided that the Prime Minister should be prepared to sit in traffic jams like every other Londoner.

    It is understood that Mr Cameron’s decision has caused concern in Scotland Yard. Security chiefs are believed to have argued against it, pointing out the difficulties of protecting a VIP stuck in traffic in a stationary car.

    The situation is highlighted by our picture of the Prime Minister in his official bomb-proof Jaguar in a jam at Great Scotland Yard today.

    Coincidentally and with immaculate if unfortunate timing, the Former Labour minister Stephen Timms is in hospital after being stabbed.

    Police said Mr Timms, 54, was stabbed in the stomach at a constituency event in Newham, east London, but stressed his injuries were not life-threatening.

    A 21-year old woman has been arrested after the attack at about 1500 BST but police have not given further details about what happened.

    He was stabbed at the Beckton Globe Library, where he holds a regular constituency surgery.

    NOTE: Mr Timms is NOT an unpopular MP In fact he is the least unpopular IN THE COUNTRY, winning 70.4% of the vote. His 27,826 majority is the largest in the new House of Commons.


    WHO WOULD WANT TO KILL A POLITICIAN?

    THIS WEEK – Charges of death threats to Blair & Brown to “lie on file”.

    See – This is Lancashire and Times:  Ishaq Kanmi faces jail for soliciting murder and Telegraph: Al Qaeda in Britain leader who threatened Gordon Brown & Tony Blair pleads guilty

    “In one of the postings made in January 2008, Kanmi was said to have compiled a list of aims for the organisation, which included “the elimination of political leaders and top of the list Blair and Brown. As God said: ‘Kill the nonbelievers’.”

    SOME TIME AGO

    Don’t think, Mr Cameron, that you are immune from this kind of hatred. You’re not. Not if you’re of any political consequence.

    Back to top


    RELATED, TIMMS ATTACK

    • 1. Telegraph on Timms attack
    • The present leader of the Labour party, Harriett Harman said: “One of the great strengths of the British political system is the every day accessibility of MPs to their constituents but we can’t have a situation where MPs are at risk. “Parliament needs to consider how best to ensure MPs can carry out their responsibilities safely.”
    • 2. Business Week – “Stephen Timms, who was U.K. chief secretary to the Treasury under Tony Blair, was hospitalized after being stabbed in his East London district.”
    • 3. Stephen Timms (Treasury Secretary until a few days ago)

    ETCETERA

    Indonesia: Let’s kill FREEDOM & democracy, starting with Obama




    Free Hit Counter


    “Look what’s happened to Labour without Tony Blair” (Ire and Cluck are as one)

    May 13, 2010
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. A recent comment“Thank you Tony Blair for all you have done to make this World, your country and mine safer. Thank you for having the courage to make the hard decisions when it would have been more expedient and less derisive not to. Thank you for being more like Mr Churchill than Mr Chamberlain. Most importantly thank you for serving your country when most of us just stand by and complain.
  • Comment at end

    13th May 2010

    COMMENTS AT THE BAN BLAIR-BAITING PETITION

    For some time I have been linking the Ban Blair-Baiting petition at the top of each post. It is not my petition but I always use it.  I think it is important. It has been slow-moving, as human nature indicates it might; people are more inclined to petition against than for any project, idea or cause. After all, that’s why most of us vote – to get or keep out those with whom we most disagree.

    There have been two comments at the petition since Labour’s demise.

    1. “Look what’s happened to Labour without Blair. You left wing ultra scum should be ashamed of yourselves letting the Tories back in!”
    2. “Although we need the government to work as a team every team requires a leader. Tony Blair when Prime Minister demonstrated the necessary leadership qualities.”

    IRE & CLUCK -THE NEW COLLECTIVE

    As someone who thinks that Tony Blair was and still is a great leader, I’d like people to vote and think positively and sign the petition because it is supportive of Mr Blair, his leadership and his legacy.

    But ‘leadership’ is up for grabs in this new dawn. It is now a collective, better to spread the praise blame.

    Right now we have the contradictory though admittedly edifying vision of  the parties of variants of Individual Responsibility Engaging (IRE for short.)

    And so marches into Day Two or is it Three of the so-called ‘Con-Dem’ coalition of Conservatives & Lib Dems. (The likelihood of the ‘CON-DEM’ jibe is possibly one reason why Mr Cameron refers to it as ‘Liberal Conservative’.)

    Condemned by their own shortcomings?

    Perhaps Labour’s current shattered state and our new unforeseen Coalition Leadership of the Unlikely & Concerned Kingmakers (CLUCK) will alter our negativity and get us all into positive thinking. Perhaps.

    Meanwhile, in the absence of leadership, vision and direction – where now for the People’s Party?

    Q&A: How will the Lib-Con coalition work?

    First coalition cabinet today. The cat that got the cream. Nick Clegg, leader of the party that came third with ONLY 57 seats out of 650 total, is now Deputy Prime Minister.

    RECENT POSTS




    Free Hit Counter



    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 1,234 other followers