Video: Democrat lawyer asks Obama to prove he is a natural-born citizen



UPDATE #3 (4th December 2008): I AM ADDING THIS VIDEO WHICH PURPORTS TO SHOW SEVERAL WAYS IN WHICH THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE SHOWN AT OBAMA’S WEBSITE IS NOT GENUINE. AND … Family Security Matters says tomorow a court ruling is due on Donofrio v. Wells. There may as a result be a constitutional crisis. Better sooner than later.




Found this site with a scan of a birth announcement of Obama’s in Hawaii. Interesting comments there. Not all convinced. Why not?

Comment at end



Philip Berg, the Democrat who has raised this issue in court, says the press is determined to be silent on this issue despite its importance to ALL Americans. If so, WHY? I wish to blacken no-one’s good name, but it can’t be THAT difficult to dig out a birth certificate, surely?

From YouTube site: (Note: this, and the “proof” section are copied directly with no alterations) [sic]:

NOTE: We only had 36 hours to produce this video, so it doesn’t have the usual Illuminati polish. However, it reveals the single greatest threat to Obama’s campaign.

In “October Surprise”, Molotov Mitchell interviews the plaintiff in a stunning federal case against Barack Obama. The case is nothing short of electrifying, but the mainstream media is doing its best to keep Americans in the dark. Let’s get the word out! Pass this video on to everyone you know.

If Obama’s innocent, then why isn’t he cooperating with the court?

This episode is brought to you by:

Related Links:

Fox Coverage…

Stop Constitutional Crisis Petition…


Obama’s Birth Certificate on his web-site and FactChech are forgeries. Here is proof.

A comparison of an actual LEGAL Birth certificate and scan results.

The Berg Lawsuit is factual and this proves it beyond a reasonable doubt.

The State of Hawaii considers a Certification of Live Birth is a secondary source of identification for the purpose of establishing Hawaiian ancestry; a Certificate of Live Birth is considered a primary source. To respond to challenges as to his eligibility for POTUS, BO first posted and then removed from his web site, a Certification of Live Birth, claiming this was his Birth Certificate. But such Certification is only issued when a birth certificate cannot be located in the records.

Because they don’t exist.
Read the full article here:

Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims…
Part 1…
Part 2…
Part 3…

I received this reply and thought it was worth posting.
It is from someone [Nameless] that appears to have a background in these documents:

This might really interest you. As your video mentioned there are two (2) birth documents.

1.The medical Birth Certificate filled out at hospital signed by doctor attesting to birth of infant, infant weight etc.
2. The legal document the Certificate of Live birth which is filled out at a Govt office. This document is a short form for legal purposes based off the medical record of the Birth Certificate.

So the question is…what was this secretary looking at when she typed out Obamas Certificate of Live Birth form in that Hawaii Govt office 47 years ago?? One clue is in the odd detail of the word “African” typed in to the space for “Race of Father”. If that secretary was looking at an AMERICAN style Birth Certificate from the hospital the “Race of Father” information would in 1961 have said “Negro” not “African”. After all “African” isn’t a race. The State of Hawaii Govt secretary would have simply typed in “Negro” in the race slot. But she didn’t. Why? Because she was looking at a Birth Certificate FROM KENYA. The poor Secretary didn’t know what to do with that. She had to fill in the “Race of Father” blank but she didn’t know if “Negro” was appropriate. After all Negro IS NOT A KENYAN TERM..KENYANS DO NOT USE THE WORD “NEGRO”, it’s an AMERICAN usage. In fact sample Kenyan birth certificates I have looked at have no slot for “Race” at all. They don’t think in those terms. So the poor secretary simply typed in “African” and was done with it.


Matter of fact the law firm that Obama hired is from CAIR. Council on American-Islamic Relations. Why would Obama hire a muslim lawyer IF he was a christian?
Of the 1,143,358 resident and active attorneys in the United States, Obama selected Joe Sandler, of the Washington law firm Sandler, Reiff, and Young to represent him in this filing.

Sandler’s role for CAIR has been to intimidate people who dare to expose the goals and actions of radical Muslims.

A Revelation TODAY 10/17/2008
A revelation just hit me between the eyes.

The Birth Certificate on Obama’s web-site.
Please bear with me.


If the BC on his website was released by any official State Dept, it would have been notorized with the embossed SEAL, signed, and dated before it was released to ANYBODY. Including Obama himself.
If it was printed out by the Dept of Health via computer, it would have to have checked, verified, and Sealed, dated, and signed, before it was released to ANMYBODY. Precaution to ANY official document.

The dept official stated that it should have the seal and date. Janice Okubo.

The same BC would have the folds as the BC would have been mailed, as per their web-site, they have NO wlk in service.


It matters because the next leader of America is also the leader of the free world. Since the press and much of the public assumes that the present American leader is “Lies Personified” the next one had better not be setting himself up for that charge, or America and the west are really in the sticky stuff.

Proving his place and country of birth and thus legitimate right to stand and be elected as president should not be something Mr Obama shies away from, just as McCain did not delay in releasing his personal information.  The request is not something to be dismissed contemptuously.

It’s easy, Mr Obama … just tell it, and show it like it is! Then we’ll all stop wondering, even Mr Berg, your Democrat colleague.

And the other charge hanging over Obama is that he is or was a Muslim. If he is or was that would concern me too, admittedly, since right now the world is being terrorised ONLY by people who purport to be “true Muslims”. A conflict of interests would NOT be a good idea at this time.


The fact that ALL erstwhile partners of the USA and, if I recall properly (can’t find the link right now) ALL Muslim countries WANT Obama as President shown by recent polling, despite knowing nothing more than I do about either candidate, is a little disconcerting to say the least. If some of those lands want him for race or perceived religious reasons then I DON’T, for exactly the same reasons. Still, according to this poll the Brits are still America’s friends.

But the snopes website is convinced that Obama is NOT a Muslim.

I am a British citizen with no vote in the American elections. In previous elections I would likely have voted Democrat, had I a vote.

But things have moved on.

As the leader of the free world it is important to me and to all of us who is the commander-in-chief in the USA. Particularly so in these testing and dangerous times.

It may be seen, by some, as politically incorrect to raise these thoughts. But there are worse things than being called politically incorrect for stating my concerns and the reasons for them. I know some will accuse me of racism. It is not so.

The racists are those who think it is fine to vote for someone because it’s time we had a black leader in the USA.

Which reminds me … I do recall Mr Powell saying last week something about reminding his children of the fight that black people have had historically in American society. Fair enough. Here in Britain some of us remind our families of the fight women had to get the vote and before that, working class men. But I have this irksome feeling that Mr Powell’s support for Obama has more to do with race than Mr Powell is saying.

Now if so, THAT’S racism. Found that link thanks to a good American friend. Here it is:

Quote from the 15th October article where Powell is doing some hip-hop. Yeah, definitely hip-hopping! Excerpt:

Powell — who has yet to back a candidate — told the audience: “I stand before you as an African-American. Many people have said to me you became secretary of state of the USA, is it still necessary to say that you are an African American or that you are black? And I say yes, so that we can remind our children.”

“It took a lot of people struggling to bring me to this point in history,” Powell told the audience. “I didn’t just drop out of the sky. People came from my continent in chains.”

Hmmm …

Colin Powell hip-hop dancing in London to the Olu Mountain hit "Yahoozee". A few days later he announced he was backing Obama.

Colin Powell was actually here in London when he joined in the dancing fun. This BBC report says that he couldn’t have understood what the lyrics were about. Excerpt:

It is not clear if Mr Powell was aware that the song was about Nigeria’s notorious internet fraudsters.

The song tells of an easy-money lifestyle of women, cars and alcohol.

The scammers, known as “yahoo yahoo boys” make money by advance fee fraud, known as “419” after the legal statute that outlaws it.

Nduka Obaigbena, publisher of Nigeria’s This Day newspaper which sponsored the Africa Rising Festival in London, said it was a misunderstanding.

“Mr Powell could not have been aware of the lyrics of the song,” he told the BBC.

The former general had been addressing the crowd at the Royal Albert Hall when the musicians came on stage.

“It would have been rude for him to have refused,” he said.

Olu Maintain – real name Olumide Edwards Adegbolu – says his song is a satire, deriding “yahoo-yahoo” culture, not glorifying it.

“The message of the song is that if you want the lifestyle of drink cars and women you have to work hard, hustle means work, not cheat,” he told the BBC.

Quite often these days, it’s hard to work out what “the message” is about, don’t you think?


Some may accuse me of being anti-Muslim, since the question of Obama’s religion is still under scrutiny by some, and tied up with the validity of his birthplace. I am not anti-Muslim, but I am anti-Islamicism, in a BIG way.

If there is the slightest chance that Obama is NOT a natural-born citizen of the USA AND/OR is or was a Muslim, I want to know. THEN the American people can decide about their president in the full knowledge of all the facts. If not “born in America” he can’t be president, in the same way as Tony Blair can’t be, even if 100% of Americans wanted him. The religion question should be easier to work through, but let’s not pretend it isn’t important!

We must know there will never be a conflict of interests, or an American president held over a barrel.

Where, this site asks, are the inexperienced white liberals Powell has endorsed?

What can we expect of the average voter, anyway, when most American voters seem pretty dumb!

Some news audiences are more politically savvy than others, according to a new poll, with readers of The New Yorker and similar high-brow magazines being the most knowledgeable.

The survey, conducted between April 30 and June 1 by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, measured the political knowledge of 3,612 U.S. adults. Participants were asked to name the controlling party of the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S. secretary of state and Great Britain’s prime minister.

Overall, just 18 percent of participants answered all three questions correctly.

More than 50 percent of Americans knew that the Democrats have a majority in the House, while 42 percent could identify the secretary of state (Condoleezza Rice). Less than 30 percent could name the prime minister of Great Britain (Gordon Brown).

But giggle not, my fellow Brits. According to this poll, just 44 percent of BBC viewers identified the prime minister correctly.

What? You mean 56% of British citizens STILL think Tony Blair’s in charge? Perhaps if we did a body swop, most of them wouldn’t notice. The swop we did last summer would be a useful model. Most of us didn’t notice that, it seems! Such are the people politicians wish “to serve”.

Baltimore Sun decries ethnic slander: “What Mr. McCain and Mrs. Palin should have told their supporters is that the only thing that counts is that Mr. Obama is an American citizen, and that his religious and ethnic background are irrelevant to his qualifications to be president. They might also have reminded them that even if Mr. Obama were Arab or Muslim, which he is not, religious and ethnic bigotry have no place in their campaign.”

TOO RIGHT, on the ethnic point anyway! Now what was that about being an American citizen?

Obama – “Powell will have a role in my administration”:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Colin Powell will have a role as a top presidential adviser in an Obama administration, the Democratic White House hopeful said Monday.

“He will have a role as one of my advisers,” Barack Obama said on NBC’s “Today” in an interview aired Monday, a day after Powell, a four-star general and President Bush’s former secretary of state, endorsed him.

“Whether he wants to take a formal role, whether that’s a good fit for him, is something we’d have to discuss,” Obama said.

Major US papers come out for Obama

The US Democratic presidential candidate, Senator Barak Obama, has received the support of three major national newspapers: The Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times. It is the first time that the Chicago and Los Angeles papers have ever endorsed a Democratic candidate. Although The New York Times has yet to endorse a candidate, no one doubts that this highly influential newspaper will back Mr Obama.

With only three weeks to go until the US presidential elections on 4 November, the Democratic candidate continues to maintain a clear lead in the opinion polls.

It’ll be interesting to see what they all say when … if he loses.

The ‘biased’ BBC – a few points ahead and Obama’s “won”. Ten points ahead and Cameron’s “losing” it! Come ON! Although America seems to agree too, on Obama.

The ‘Constitution Club’ blog has this, and a comment which says (sic):

‘Barack Hussiein Muhammad Obama’s father has his nationality listed as ARAB on his birth certificate – NOT African Black ! This means that Obama would be NOT “black” American, but ARAB American if he should win the election.

An Arab in the White House, the Arab Muslim dream and goal.

This is what he is hiding and one of the reasons why he refuses to show /present his birrth certificate. His father only has 12% black in his blood line. He was over 87% Arab and listed so on his birth certificate. He does not want anyone to know this.

Obama himself only has less than 6% black in him.

He may have been acttually born in Kenya, not Hawaii. This would make him Foreign and NOT elegible for President.’

Not sure how this commenter KNOWS what’s on the Big O’s birth certificate. But I still think we should be shown Obama’s original birth certificate. Then I and the conspiracy theorists can all belt up. Fed up with most of them, anyway.  Got to watch the company I keep.


Free Hit Counter


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

20 Responses to “Video: Democrat lawyer asks Obama to prove he is a natural-born citizen”

  1. mari anne burton Says:

    PLEASE PLEASE find some news agency that will report this and at least demand that OBAMA cough up a birth certificate..verified by Hawaii…My son was born in HI and it is not that difficult to get a bc…Why don’t you make this a big media stink…this is huge in the state of the world..not only important in the US!!!
    The future of the free wolrd is definitley at stake…If you can’t even be honest and proud of where you were born…what is Obama really standing for???
    Most Americans I know might be disgusted with some of our politics and leaders but we are still proud to be an American and would proudly display our birth certificate along with our flag!!
    Thank you M

  2. mari anne burton Says:

    PS If Obama is unwilling to prove something he is saying…and if he is lying about where he was born…Do we really want a President who thinks its okay to hide the evidence and possibly break the law BEFORE he is even in office??
    (In US you have to be a natural citizen to run for Pres..)

    Does Obama think he is above the Constitution of the US..or is it he isn’t a natural citizen and never studied US history….

    I don’t think he has a chance to be President of the US now….The American public has the right to know…and God help him if he pursues this…I am sure he will be deported!!!

    Fraud is still a crime…Omission of truth is still lying…If there is nothing to hide….A proper Birth certificate sent to the courts from Hawaii State Birth Records would prove it..if it exists!!!

  3. keeptonyblairforpm Says:

    Well, Mari, it’s all over the internet. If you are in the USA surely you have read this in the printed press or on the news?

    It somehow seems too big a story NOT to be covered by the mainstream press as well as the internet. And I can’t imagine the Republicans wouldn’t try to pursue it if it were true.

    There’s still time!

    I sincerely hope it is NOT true. Otherwise if it is found out to be true after he is elected, IF he is elected president, this will be earth shatteringly serious.

    Can’t see why he doesn’t produce the papers now and tell everyone to go away, in the nicest possible way!

  4. Mr. Chicago Says:

    Our politicians are not working within the law, they are all crooks and this just might be the “mistake” that allows congress to amend the Constitution so that people who are not natural citizens to become president of the U.S.

    They already tried to get Arnold ok’d for the presidency and have already had bills on the floor for this exact situation.

    So, if they get him in, then it would be easy to sell the “mistake” and ammend the Constitution!

    Remember, they do not play within the laws, the rules of late are to break them and then write new laws to fit what you are doing! Kind of like a dictatorship with elections and a change of the guard every so often so we have the appearance of democracy!

  5. keeptonyblairforpm Says:

    Mr Chicago,

    There are plenty of people who think like this, though that kind of disregard for the rules tends to be believed by people on the Left of people and parties of the Right.

    But if what you are saying is true, both sides would rather let the other side into office than pull the plug on a huge deceit on the electorate (such as this Obama birthplace business, if it is true). That seems highly unlikely and against human and political behaviour.

    On the other hand, if there is any truth in this story, and the Republicans have not unearthed it, WHY NOT?

    That’s why I’m still taking it with a large pinch of salt.

    Your premise means that both parties KNOW there is something not right here, but both are ignoring it for reasons best known to themselves.

    I can’t really imagine that the Republicans would want the constitution to be changed AFTER the event of Obama winning. That could usher in all sorts of unsavoury characters.

    Then again there may be one or two individuals who do not comply with the constitution’s rules, that BOTH sides might be happy with. Well, I can think of one.

    Who knows … knows, as they say.

  6. cpabooks Says:

    The reason that the Republicans have not presented the birth certificate is obvious. The issue is radioactive. McCain/Palin would be accused of participating in some racist conspiracy since they would be the direct beneficiaries. Berg, on the other hand, is a life member of the NAACP and Liberal/Moderate Democrat. As a Hillary Clinton supporter (time & $) he is arguing that he was injured by Obama’s fraud.

  7. keeptonyblairforpm Says:

    Well, obviously the Republicans cannot overtly accuse Obama of misleading the American people for the reason you say. That shouldn’t prevent them looking into it via a third party.

    But if Berg can’t have his claims taken seriously by the courts, or is proved to be wrong, that would seem to be the end of it.

    I’m not a great one for conspiracy theories, but I still ask why Obama doesn’t just come right out and provide the information.

    Perhaps he will produce the papers this week, thus eliciting more sympathy (as some think he is doing with the ‘sick Grandma’ story). Then he could claim that the ‘racist Right’ were showing their true colours all along in pursuing him erroneously.

    So, agreed, this is radioactive for the Republican party and its candidate. It’s up to Berg and the seven or so others who are taking it to state courts, I guess.

    Perhaps they ARE wrong.

  8. “Trick or Treat, Mr O?” Show us the Money, say your citizens « Tony Blair Says:

    […] a hellish maelstrom.  And all these rumours could be so easily quashed, with, as I mentioned at an earlier post, the production of the necessary legally verified paper. Certainly, the ’sealing’ of […]

  9. Bryan Says:

    This whole thing is the most absurd example of “Swiftboating” there has ever been. First of all, it comes so late in the campaign that if gives little time for a serious reply, so the few idiots that believe it, will only find out later that none of the accusations were were valid.

    Plain and simple, it is a conspiracy theory and like most completely baseless and posed upon the “possibility” that people had reason to forge public documents. In this case, clearly the “secretary” who issued the official birth certificate whether the original or not, had no motive for simply lying or misrepresenting the truth as, at that time, there was nothing to be gained for her/him.

    The assertion that this is not proof, is irrelevant, whether the “original” document, or not. Loss of an original is incredibly common; that’s why the state keeps “an original” to allow for such certification as has been legally provided by Obama.

    I have 10 official birth certificates but no original, and if someone tried to suggest I was not actually born in Rome, GA just because I lost a piece of paper, and they suggested there was some kind of “conspiracy”, I would punch them in the nose if I thought they could possibly stand in the way of my rightful citizenship. Fortunately, the procedures of any state forgo such challenges and rightly so.

    Such “whisper campaigns” are the lowest form of gossip and, in this case, so damaging because of the sheer importance of this political decision.

  10. Arlene Says:

    The problem as I see it, is there is a pattern here; lost birth certificate (from a state that keeps its records of “Live Birth” for 100 years), lost College Thesis, no list of clients Obama represented as a lawyer and it goes on and on. Lost, lost, lost and We the People are supposed to just accept that? These are not smears, they are genuine concerns of millions of Americans. We have a RIGHT to know who is in that suit. We know ALL about McCain and Palin. We know NOTHING about Obama, except for his rhetoric of intolerance and devisiveness.
    Californians for McCain

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s