(Transcript) – British army captain says “the soldiers support the cause in Afghanistan”

by
  • Original Home Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Is ‘President Blair’ a shoo-in? Yes and No
  • “Ban Blair-Baiting” petition – please sign
  • Why Iraq is NO reason to reject President Blair
  • Comment at end

    10th November, 2009

    Captain Tiernan: ‘Often we hear people say “yes we support the soldiers but we don’t support the cause”.  Well, the soldiers support the cause.  So if you really want to support the soldiers then we too as the public should support the cause in Afghanistan.’

    On Radio 4’s ‘Today’, yesterday morning, a serving British soldier was interviewed on the slipping public support for the war in Afghanistan.

    Margaret, a regular reader and commenter at this blog has kindly transcribed the interview for me.

    Visit the BBC site and scroll down to 8:10 here to hear the entire interview.

    Read Little Ole American’s comment here on the opening remark of John  Humprhies. (excerpt: We do NOT send our young people “to die”.)  Mr Humphries, your bias is showing.


    Today interview (10 minutes):

     

    John Humphries: We spend a lot of time on this programme talking to politicians  about what we’re doing in Afghanistan  and why. Quite right too. When a nation sends its young people to die in a foreign land – another one has just been killed – they must be held accountable. We spend very little time talking to the men who are sent, who risk their lives doing their duty. The men and women who know what is happening on the ground because they live there for six months at a time.  Captain Andrew Tiernan of the Grenadier Guards is one of them. He came back from Afghanistan for a bit of leave on Friday. He’ll be back there the week after next. This is his third tour of duty there in three years, and he’s with me now. Can I make it clear Captain Tiernan that you’re not here because the MOD put you up for it, it’s cos your mother suggested it.

    Capt. Tiernan: Er that’s correct I travelled home and was subject to 48 hours worth of Sky and BBC news courtesy of the RAF and as I watched that news I became a little frustrated at some of the negative reporting on Afghanistan, mentioned that to mother and before I knew it I  had a phone call from the editor of your  programme.

    John Humphries: Hmmm… and you say negative reporting … um … but we’re reporting what is happening, you appreciate that, I mean if five people are killed as they were horribly last week by a policeman, we have to report it.

    Capt. Tiernan: Absolutely, and the tragic events of last week need to be reported and I believe were reported well. But lots of the talk subsequently about a wholesale pull-out from Afghanistan does not support the soldiers who are out there risking their lives. Often we hear people saying, “yes, we support the soldiers but we don’t support the cause “.  Well, the soldiers support the cause.  So if you really want to support the soldiers then we too as a public should support the cause in Afghanistan.

    John Humphries: I suppose the reason a lot of people say that  – that we ought to pull out  – is because they don’t – we don’t understand exactly what it is you’re doing there, what the purpose of it is and when we will know whether you have achieved that purpose or not.

    Capt. Tiernan: Erm… perhaps that ‘s the case but I’m sure that ‘s been the same on every battlefield throughout history.

    John Humphries: Has it?

    Capt. Tiernan: Well, er I believe so and perhaps I can use this opportunity to tell you some of the things that we are doing.

    John Humphries: Please do.

    Capt. Tiernan: I’m commanding a company group of some 120 soldiers comprised of two Grenadier platoons, an Afghan national army company and importantly 15 Afghan national policemen, and we are providing security to the people in a district centre in Baku centre south nearby to Lashkar Gah And the ideal that we’re building towards is  an outer ring of security provided by ISAF and the Afghan national Army…

    John Humphries: ISAF being the international force, yeah?

    Capt. Tiernan: That’s correct and an inner ring of security provided by the Afghan police and working alongside ISAF . We are able to keep the insurgents away from the district centre so the people in that population centre live in a way that is akin to a gated community with that security provided by us. There  is a curfew in place for instance at 21.00 hours at night so when they go to bed more often than not we’re patrolling the streets and continue to do so throughout the night. In the morning when they wake up we ‘re there again. So they close their doors at night and go to bed safe in the knowledge that ISAF and Afghan national security forces are securing …

    John Humphries: I want to come back to this notion of a gated community in a moment, but when you talk about training or mentoring police for instance in that part of the world, it’s very difficult to understand how you can do that. With great respect you’re a brave, highly trained officer in the British Army but you know nothing about the kind of lives those people lead and we know are leading, I mean we know that a very large proportion of the police force are on drugs. We know that they can effectively buy their way in, they’ve only got to have a couple of friends vouch for them, senior officers pay a £100,000, $100,000 to become a senior  police officer. In those circumstances, knowing nothing about the culture of the place, knowing nothing about the tribal relationships and all the rest of it, how can you, however good you are at your job, train those people?

    Capt. Tiernan: Well, how foolish would it be to go about any kind of operations in Afghanistan without being alongside the Afghan national  security forces? If we were just there on our own we’d be far less effective.  For instance the Afghan national policemen who I work with have saved the lives of my men by finding improvised explosive devices in the ground.  They  were metres away from where I ws standing but I would not have noticed them because I don’t live there. The Afghan desert to me looks pretty similar. Whereas to the policemen that live and work there and from those areas a little bit of disturbed earth which is pretty innocuous to me is telling to them. And what we are now doing in Afghanistan, er, General McChrystal’s directive towards imbedded partnering which means completely working hand in hand with Afghan national security forces…

    John Humphries: Living with them ..

    Capt. Tiernan: Living with them, planning with them, operating with them, his directive is one of those rare documents that is so strikingly correct that everyone that reads it from the lowest ground commanders to the most senior  military commander understands its worth, understands what it aims to do and is very happy with the strategy there.

    John Humphries: So is the idea that you become entirely integrated with those forces or they with you?

    Capt. Tiernan: Er… exactly we come together and work hand in hand.

    John Humphries: But you live separately?

    Capt. Tiernan: No, that’s one of the…

    John Humphries: So you will share barracks, you will share a tent?

    Capt. Tiernan: Yeah, in my area we will share an [option room?] we’ll share a planning room and our soldiers will live together.

    John Humphries: Quite literally, in the sense that you’ll line up in the same line to get your food, you’ll have bunk beds next to each other, all that sort of thing?

    Capt. Tiernan: Quite literally.

    John Humphries: And how long does it take to establish that kind of relationship and how do you know, putting it very crudely, that you can trust them?

    Capt. Tiernan: Um… well I think I am fortunate in my area in that we’re perhaps slightly ahead of the game.  I think if operation Herrick 10 was defined by Operation Panthers Claw which was clearly widely reported on, I think this…

    John Humphries: In which a lot of people die.

    Capt. Tiernan: Indeed, but I think this operation, Operation Herrik 11 will be defined by a move towards embedded partnering, and in my area where geographically the lay down of forces goographically, the willingness of the local people and the quality of the Afghan national security forces that are under my command means that we’re ready now to do embedded partnering  and I expect us to one of the first areas of operations in Helmand to be fully embedded.

    John Humphries: But if what you’re doing, if the purpose of this is to establish as you put it gated communities one does  have to wonder about how long it can go on. You can’t forever protect a group of Afghan people, however a noble that job may be, that isn’t what British forces are meant to be doing, is it? You’re meant if you can to be bringing peace to that part of the world, you can’t do it by hunkering down, collecting a group of people together and having a couple of rings of steel around them so they can go about their business within that  gated community. That’s not what’s meant to be going on is it?

    Capt. Tiernan: Well what’s meant to be going on and what is going on is that the British army’s engaged in a counter- insurgency campaign alongside the international security forces and the Afghan national security forces. A classic counter-insurgency campaign will talk about the ‘inkspot approach’ and that means that you provide an area or you secure an area such as a gated community, such as I have got in my area of operations, and because you then demonstrate to the population how life is better when it’s under the influence of ISAF and Afghan national security forces as opposed to the Taliban or the insurgency then that attracts other people into that area and the inkspot can spread.  So in my area we opened up a school two weeks ago which is a huge, huge thing for  the local people, and indeed my commanding officer said that the thermometer of our success would be the success of that school, so you would be…

    John Humphries: But as soon as you go the Taliban will come back.

    Capt. Tiernan: Well, hopefully when we go we leave behind Afghan national security forces that can provide their own security.

    John Humphries: How long will that take?

    Capt. Tiernan: I am not going to speculate on how long that can take, I believe the chief of the defence staff spoke on that yesterday. But what I can say what I can speak about is that is my third tour in Afghanistan in successive years. The first time I was there we were engaged mainly in defeating the Taliban. Last summer we were…

    John Humphries: Which we thought we had done and failed.

    Capt. Tiernan: Which in my experience we were doing pretty successfully. Last summer I was on patrol with Afghans but with a smaller group say 3 or 4 Afghans to maybe 20 British soldiers and here with McChrystal’s directive which has the support of Task Force Helmund’s headquarters we see British forces moving towards embedded partnering.  As I have said I believe that’s exactly the right way forward in Afghanistan.

    John Humphries: But as things stand we are getting this dreadful drip drip drip of British soldiers being killed in Afghanistan. It’s averaging about 2 a week isn’t it this year so far. And their loved ones here at home are wondering how long it’s going to go on. Obviously you as a captain cannot tell me that, but they are asking themselves what is the evidence that it’s working. You can say from your narrow obviously micro view of what’s going on that in your particular area you’re with a decent bunch of people who are doing a decent job. You can’t speak for the country as a whole, can you?

    Capt. Tiernan: Of course I can’t, but I know of my colleagues and friends who are doing similar jobs to me throughout the province and throughout our battle area, they are having similar experiences.

    John Humphries: And you’ll be happy  to go back?

    Capt. Tiernan: I think the fact that I am there for the third year in a row suggests I’m happy to go back, yes.

    John Humphries: Captain Andrew Tiernan thank you very much.


    RELATED

     

    British operations in Helmand, Afghanistan (including Operation Herrick) (pdf) by Daniel Marston.

    Daniel Marston is a Research Fellow at the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at the Australian National University and a Visiting Fellow with the Oxford Leverhulme Programme on the Changing Character of War. He was previously a Senior Lecturer in War Studies at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. He has focused on the topic of how armies learn and reform as a central theme in his academic research. Dr Marston was responsible for overseeing the counter-insurgency modules for Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and the British Army. He has lectured widely on the principles and practices of counter-insurgency to units of the American, Australian, British and Canadian armed forces, as well as serving as a reviewer of and contributor to counter-insurgency doctrine for all of the above. He also continues academic research in this area, and in 2005 was appointed a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society.

    The DREADFUL BUSINESS of Jamie Janes’s mother and the PM

    The story of the death of, co-incidentally, Grenadier Guardsman Jamie Janes, has taken over our airwaves over the last few days. You can hardly fail to empathise with the mother in her phone call discussion with Gordon Brown. You should also question WHY The Sun is running this campaign.

    I believe the attack on Gordon Brown by a bereaved mother is unfair and unbalanced. Not because she is angry and feels that she has (right or wrong) full knowledge of all the facts regarding equipment, army funding and of the position on the ground on the day her son was killed.

    I believe it is unfair because Mr Brown’s letter to her was clearly not meant to be an insult to her son.

    And yet it has been portrayed as such. The whole business has been hijacked for political purposes. Mr Brown, for all his bad writing and spelling, has taken the trouble to write personally to bereaved relatives. And no allowance has been given for his poor eyesight. We are always going to have bereaved families who will blame government decision, shortcomings, “lack of” equipment. It is to my mind, beneath contempt that the papers have encouraged this bereaved mother – as I am sure they have – to record her phone conversation with the prime minister, in order – and ONLY in order to make it more difficult for him, the government, the army and in the end the entire operation in Afghanistan.

    Listen to this bereaved mother’s phone call with Gordon Brown (almost 13 minutes).

    While naturally sympathising with her loss, I refuse to get on board this bandwagon.  Mrs Janes  may well have complaints about equipment and there may even by some truth in the treasury’s historical position as regards funding the forces – “do you understand, Mr Brown, lack of equipment?” But in his letter to this mother I think Mr Brown was empathising and sympathising with her loss. Nothing else. Until this story broke we did not know that he had been writing to bereaved relatives.

    This mother does NOT know all the ins and outs of the position on the spot at the time her son was killed.  Brown clearly had no other intention than to pass on his personal condolences. That should be reflected better, in my opinion, by this bereaved mother.




    Free Hit Counter

     


    Advertisements

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

    4 Responses to “(Transcript) – British army captain says “the soldiers support the cause in Afghanistan””

    1. Little Ole American Says:

      KTBFPM,
      As one who supports the troops and therefore, MUST support the cause, it is good to hear from the good Captain even though we have to put up with the interruptions and suppositions of the interviewer. The first thing I noticed was Mr. Humphries saying, ”
      “When a nation sends its young people to die in a foreign land – another one has just been killed.”
      The fact of the matter is we do NOT send our young people to DIE in a foreign land, we send them to fight, to train, to build the infrastructure and yes, we send people who are willing to give their lives for THEIR country in the name of freedom and peace. If we can bring law and order to Iraq and Afghanistan, then that will guarantee peace within their borders and build a good and lasting relationship with the West. The goals of strengthening and supporting the lawful military police and the leaders of Iraq and Afghanistan will ensure the destruction of the Taliban and other terrorist groups who would still destroy the West if they gain the upper hand. Our men and women know exactly what they are doing and why. Failure in Iraq and Afghanistan would be opening the door to more terrorism in the world. God Bless our troops.

      • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

        Ref:

        “When a nation sends its young people to die in a foreign land – another one has just been killed.” The fact of the matter is we do NOT send our young people to DIE in a foreign land, we send them to fight, to train, to build the infrastructure and yes, we send people who are willing to give their lives for THEIR country in the name of freedom and peace.

        I am so glad you pointed this out. I’ll link to your comment from the top of the post, btw.

        John Humphries and many on the BBC and other left-leaning broadcasters frequently make this kind of statement. They know that by such brainwashing, opining stated as facts, we will take it as read that the foundations of the TRUTH are the “politicians bad guys, We good guys” kind of argument.

        What irritated me most about Humprhies’ words was actually the next phrase – “they (the politicians) must be held accountable”. Welll – YES, and NO. At elections they are held accountable, not every other day on the BBC! How the hell are they supposed to do the job for which they were elected or put in motion any policy if they are constantly attacked? I don’t mean we should never question politicians, but I do think that it goes over the top at times when we seem to assume that they never have any thoughts about the good, safety or well-being of others, whereas ‘WE’, of course, do.

        In this the main culprits, as we know if we read anything, are the feral press, aided and abetted by their viral children, the bloggers and single issue campaigners . They all have agendas, political, personal etc, and they use any willing member of the public in pursuit of that agenda.

        We need to hear more and more on a regular basis from the soldiers. The army/MOD need to set up a press team to report on progress, to balance the reports such as “another soldier was killed today – he was 20”. They will get criticism for this, but let’s be blunt they’re damned if they do, damned if they don’t. Might as well “do”.

    2. Little Ole American Says:

      I must also agree with you on the PM’s intentions with regards to the letter to the dear mother. He meant only heart felt sympathy, I am sure. One’s eyesight can be a real problem with reading your own handwriting. Perhaps he should start having the letters typed which isn’t as warm, but at least he would not have to go through this situation again.

      • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

        Little Ole – It seems no PM has ever done this before. If so, that I think Mr Brown is to be congratulated. He has presumably been doing this for some time, although we have never been told about it. It carries a risk, even if he had beautiful hand-writing and poetic prose. In the hands of someone who is bitter and has an agenda this attack was pretty much inevitable.

        Oddly enough I think Mr Brown will come out of it better than The Sun hoped por planned for. I certainly have more respect for him after this, not less. And I’m not his biggest fan, as you will know. And even the mother this afternoon said it has become a bandwagon too far, and not what she intended.

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s