Comment at end
26th January, 2010
“TONY BLAIR SUPPORTED THE USA; NOW IT IS TIME TO SUPPORT TONY BLAIR”
Erik Svane at his blog – No Pasaran – says – “Tony Blair Supported the United States; Now It Is Time to Support Tony Blair”
Thank you for this post, Erik. As Blair Supporters in Britain, where Mr Blair is under relentless attack by the mainstream press (see previous post) we DO appreciate your work, and would like to thank you for the ensuing signatures at the Ban Blair-Baiting petition.
Watch the Iraq Inquiry live here. Today, Sir Michael Wood Legal Adviser, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 2001 – 2006 – the Foreign Office’s most senior legal adviser said that he believed that the Iraq invasion was against international law. David Brummell, Legal Secretary to the Law Officers, 2001 – 2004 also provided his evidence this morning.
Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Deputy Legal Adviser, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 2001 – 2003, who resigned over the invasion decision on grounds of “legality” will give her evidence this afternoon, as will Margaret Beckett, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, May 2006 – June 2007.
Tomorrow, Rt Hon Lord Goldsmith QC, the Attorney General, June 2001 to June 2007 will give his evidence for the entire day.
Thursday they all have a day off, in preparation, presumably for this –
On Friday Tony Blair himself will give his testimony under necessary high security. The security costs should be sent to all the Blair haters in the press and in the Stop-The -War campaign, whose incitement against Mr Blair, based on ignorance, brainwashing and bone-headed bias, is costing far more than it would if the Haters REALLY believed in “innocent until proven guilty”.
And, as Sir John Chilcot continually reminds us – “This is not a trial.”
posted by Erik @ 20:57
Now it is time to give our support to Tony Blair!
…And to sign the petition…
Justice for Tony Blair demands that
It is now time to stop BLAIR-baiting, i.e. attacks on our former Prime Minister by the dogs of anti-war. Less metaphorically it can be defined as the constant incitement of hatred against Tony Blair for taking us to war in Iraq.
This year’s Blair-baiting season will reach its peak when the Iraq war inquiry starts to call witnesses. Parts of the media, the anti-Iraq war lobby and some families of soldiers killed in the war are already calling for this to be a TRIAL of Tony Blair with a view to gathering as much evidence as possible to send him to The Hague for “war crimes”. Except that unlike a normal trial, Tony Blair has been presumed guilty in advance.
What is most galling about the hysterical calls calling for Blair‘s (and Bush’s) head(s) is that it is taken as a given that 1) Blair (and Bush) lied and/or made (unforgivable) mistakes and that 2) Blair‘s and Bush’s (alleged) lies and/or (alleged) mistakes before the conflict led to a war with a country as innocent, as peaceful, and as nonthreatening (both domestically and internationally) as the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
The issue of weapons of mass destruction is laughed off offhand, with snorts and scorn, as if Luxembourg (or a country like it) had been the country accused of harboring ABCs. Note: the reason people — all people, not just Bush and Blair, and in nations both within and without the Coalition of the Willing — believed Saddam Hussein had weapons was that he had harbored them and that, indeed, he had used them. Saddam used chemical weapons on Iranian troops, he used them on Kurdish civilians, and he tried building nuclear weapons.
It is my fervent hope that when the trial begins, Blair won’t just sit there, but that he will turn the tables on his castigators (the self-described humanitarians and human rights activists) and hammer this theme home. With quotes from all the varying actors stating their firm conviction that Iraq and/or Saddam needed to be confronted.
- Read some choice quotes of Tony Blair…
- Is there any truth to Tony Blair being the Yanks’ poodle?
- Did Bush and Blair Lie About WMD?
- So Long As We Are Hunting for Liars in the Iraq Controversy…
The following excerpt comes from a post (So Long As We Are Hunting for Liars in the Iraq Controversy) written about Bush and his American castigators, but it can easily adapted for Tony or for any like-minded ally in the Coalition of the Willing):
In the following sentence, [we can couple “the Democrats” with “the Europeans” as well as Britain’s anti-Blairites, all of which fall] under what Norman Podhoretz calls “all those who in their desperation to delegitimize the larger policy being tested in Iraq … have consistently used distortion, misrepresentation and selective perception to vilify as immoral a bold and noble enterprise”: … so long as we are hunting for liars in this area, let me suggest that we begin with the Democrats now proclaiming that they were duped, and that we then broaden out to all those who in their desperation to delegitimize the larger policy being tested in Iraq–the policy of making the Middle East safe for America by making it safe for democracy–have consistently used distortion, misrepresentation and selective perception to vilify as immoral a bold and noble enterprise and to brand as an ignominious defeat what is proving itself more and more every day to be a victory of American arms and a vindication of American ideals. [As well as British ones — natch!]
Tags: Adviser, David Brummell, Deputy Legal Adviser, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Erik Svane, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Foreign Office, Iraq inquiry, Legal Secretary to the Law Officers, Margaret Beckett, no pasarán, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Sir John Chilcot, Sir Michael Wood, time to support Tony Blair, Tony Blair