Dutch coalition collapses over Afghanistan dispute. A portent for Britain?

by
  • Original Home Page
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • All Links to ‘The Trial of Tony Blair’ posts
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. “He’s not a war criminal. He’s not evil. He didn’t lie. He didn’t sell out Britain or commit treason. He wasn’t Bush’s poodle. He hasn’t got blood on his hands. The anti-war nutters must not be allowed to damage Blair’s reputation further. He was a great PM, a great statesman and a great leader.”
  • Comment at end

    Ban Blair-Baiting

    GoPetition

    20th February, 2010

    COALITION COLLAPSES DUE TO A WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST

    With all the recent talk about possible electoral (voting) reform in Britain this development in the Netherlands should not be disregarded. It’s tough enough explaining to the liberal left that Britain is STILL an important part of the world’s international community without having to swallow their narrow and often wrong-headed thinking too. The Liberal Democrats, and its so-called “internationalist” buddies  – Labour’s Old Left – only ever consider ‘rights’ and not ‘responsibilities’  when it comes to pulling one’s weight in the world.

    Dutch government collapses after Labour withdrawal from coalition

    Row over extension of Dutch troops’ tour of duty in Afghanistan forces Labour out of Jan Peter Balkenende’s ruling coalition

    The Dutch government has ­collapsed over disagreements on whether or not to extend troop deployment in Afghanistan.

    The prime minister, Jan Peter Balkenende, said the Labour party – the second-largest party in his coalition government – was quitting.

    Balkenende has been weighing up a request from Nato for Dutch troops to stay in Afghanistan beyond 2010.

    Just under 2,000 Dutch personnel have been serving in the southern Afghan province of Uruzgan, where 21 Dutch soldiers have been killed.

    Balkenende’s Christian Democratic Alliance wants to keep a trimmed-down military presence in the region, but the Labour party has demanded the Netherlands sticks to a scheduled withdrawal.

    The troops should have returned home in 2008, but their stay was extended to August 2010 because no other Nato country offered replacements.

    “A plan was agreed to when our soldiers went to Afghanistan,” said the Labour leader, Wouter Bos. “Our partners in the government didn’t want to stick to that plan, and on the basis of their refusal we have decided to resign from this government.”

    Balkenende said his center-right party would continue in office together with the Christian Union party.

    However, André Rouvoet, leader of the Christian Union, said Queen Beatrix, the Netherlands’s ceremonial head of state, who will formally accept the resignations of Labour ministers today, “will ask the remaining ministers to prepare for elections”.

    In Brussels, Nato spokesman James Appathurai said the military alliance did not comment on the internal political debates of member countries.

    “Of course, Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen continues to believe that the best way forward would be a new, smaller Dutch mission, including a provincial reconstruction team in Uruzgan,” Appathurai added. He said this would consolidate the success that the Dutch have had and ease the transition of security keeping to Afghan forces.

    Any Dutch withdrawal would be a worrying sign for the alliance, which has struggled to raise the 10,000 additional troops that its top commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, has demanded to accompany the 30,000 US reinforcements being deployed there.

    The Labour withdrawal leaves the coalition with just 47 seats in the 150-member parliament. Elections can be held as early as May under Dutch law – one year ahead of schedule.


    RELATED

    Thanks to Little Ole American for these links –




    Free Hit Counter


    Advertisements

    Tags: , , , ,

    2 Responses to “Dutch coalition collapses over Afghanistan dispute. A portent for Britain?”

    1. Little Ole American Says:

      There’s more at http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/military-unions-angry-uruzgan-withdrawal
      I was led to the above site by Michael Yon’s Facebook post. Michael will tell you, the Dutch soldiers are fantastic soldiers and greatly needed. NATO’s propaganda boasts the credit for a closer relationship with Pakistan (in actuality, it is the US who has fostered a closer relationship) and for many of the successes of the American and British forces. NATO is a joke. They can’t even manage to protect the Cell Towers, which means the Afghans cannot call for help if there is an emergency at night.
      It is the American, British, Canadian, Dutch, Aussie and other coalition troops who are having the successes, and making the sacrifices that NATO takes credit for. Unbelievable!

      • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

        Couldn’t agree more, and as in Vietnam it will be at home that this war will be lost, not at the hands of the troops.

        Can you send me any Michal Yon links, Little Ole American? Now there’s a guy who knows.

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s