Binyam Mohamed – 1, MI5 & Britain’s Security – Nil. Happy now Siddique?

by
  • Original Home Page
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • All Links to ‘The Trial of Tony Blair’ posts
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. “He’s not a war criminal. He’s not evil. He didn’t lie. He didn’t sell out Britain or commit treason. He wasn’t Bush’s poodle. He hasn’t got blood on his hands. The anti-war nutters must not be allowed to damage Blair’s reputation further. He was a great PM, a great statesman and a great leader.”
  • Comment at end

    Ban Blair-Baiting

    GoPetition

    26th February, 2010

    From Haroon Siddique at The Guardian

    Live blog: Criticism of MI5 to be restored to Binyam Mohamed judgment

    Haroon Siddique follows reaction to court ruling that criticism of MI5, removed from judgment in Binyam Mohamed case at behest of government, is to be restored.

    Mr Siddique says –

    So here’s the new paragraph 168, i.e. the new version of the passage that was deleted at the behest of the government. I’ve highlighted some of the key criticisms.

    “168. Fourthly, it is also germane that the Security Services had made it clear in March 2005, through a report from the Intelligence and Security Committee, that they operated a culture that respected human rights and that coercive interrogation techniques were alien to the Services’ general ethics, methodology and training(paragraph 9 of the first judgment), indeed they denied that [they] knew of any ill-treatment of detainees interviewed by them whilst detained by or on behalf of the [US] Government” (paragraph 44(ii) of the fourth judgment).
    “Yet, in this case, that does not seem to have been true: as the evidence showed, some Security Services officials appear to have a dubious record relating to actual involvement, and frankness about any such involvement, with the mistreatment of Mr Mohamed when he was held at the behest of US officials. I have in mind in particular witness B, but the evidence in this case suggests that it is likely that there were others.
    “The good faith of the Foreign Secretary is not in question, but he prepared the certificates partly, possibly largely, on the basis of information and advice provided by Security Services personnel. Regrettably, but inevitably, this must raise the question whether any statement in the certificates on an issue concerning the mistreatment of Mr Mohamed can be relied on, especially when the issue is whether contemporaneous communications to the Security Services about such mistreatment should be revealed publicly.
    “Not only is there some reason for distrusting such a statement, given that it is based on Security Services’ advice and information, because of previous, albeit general, assurances in 2005, but also the Security Services have an interest in the suppression of such information.”

    Without stepping on too many toes, though I am FULLY aware that I will, I’d like to ask Mr Siddique this:

    would Mr Siddique kindly inform us about the native country of his ancestral family? Is their record on securing the safety and human rights of its citizens unquestionable, without blemish? He is not yet listed on Wikipedia but similar spellings of his name are.

    For the Article on Siddiqis in the Horn of Africa, see Siddiqis in the Horn of Africa; For the Pakistani scientist and alleged al-Qaeda member convicted in the U.S. of attempted murder, see Aafia Siddiqui.

    Siddiqui, (also rendered as Siddiqi, Siddique, Siddiquee, Siddighi, Seddighi or Siddiquie) (Arabic: صدیقی‎) is a Muslim family name, found in South Asia and the Middle East. Shaikh is an additional title used occasionally by Siddiqui/Siddique to signify their Arab heritage.

    The name “Siddiqui” derives from the word Siddiq, which means “truthful” in Arabic. “Al-Siddiq” was the title accorded to Abu Bakr (Arabic: ابو بكر الصديق‎), the first Khalifa (Caliph) and close friend of Prophet Mohammad. He was the greatest of the Companions or Sahabba and belonged to the Banu Taim clan of the Quraish. The surname “Siddiqui/Siddique” signifies ancestry (purported or otherwise) from Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq (RA).

    In South Asia, the name Siddiqui implies membership of the Shaikh community, which is one of the four communities that make up the Ashraf category. Communities that use the surname include Manihar, Muslim Kayasths, Bisati and the Shaikhs

    The Siddiqui surname is found among a number of ethnic groups and communities spread across Middle East, Africa, Central Asia and South Asia.

    If you are of the opinion that is is un-pc of me to mention this, TOUGH. I know I have no racial prejudices. I also know that I trust my government and security services more than I trust Mr Mohamed or Mr Siddique.

    My ancestral home, BRITAIN, did not develop its multi-faceted and liberal thesis on human rights and the protection of its citizens, over CENTURIES, at the behest of such as MR SIDDIQUE. Somehow or other, without his help, we struggled through to become the model for MOST if not ALL modern democracies.

    We didn’t need his great insight and assistance in interpreting the relevant facts over the last thousand years or more, and we sure as hell don’t need them now.  Our courts are already daft and unbalanced enough without his cheerleading adding to the mix.

    Try being truthful and honest in your “reporting” next time, Mr Guardian writer. Don’t just highlight the sections which you, in all your wisdom, think we need to see in order to help YOU in your apparent aim of the discrediting and weakening of  OUR security services and our government. After all you live in Britain right now (presumably) – the land where freedom and justice for ALL rules. OK?




    Free Hit Counter


    Advertisements

    Tags: , , ,

    One Response to “Binyam Mohamed – 1, MI5 & Britain’s Security – Nil. Happy now Siddique?”

    1. DevinWeiss Says:

      Barack Obama’s book, “The Audacity of Hope,” has a appealing title. It has a taste of bravery mixed with full confidence. There is nothing Pollyanna regarding it. I would possibly not support every part he says, but he’s our president, as well as for me, he creates confidence. Which will do more for a region than any amount of backroom deals. Hope gives us energy, and energy sustains us through trying times. Boy, we’ve had them. I’m from West Texas, and I did not vote for Bush. When McCain ran against Obama, I was a citizen of Arizona, but I gave audacious hope a chance. The fight for progress and laying the foundations of prosperity will not be over. I’ve seen the quips of those who don’t think Obama can make it. But step back a moment. Would anyone have most of us fail simply to tarnish the star of an incumbent for whom they did not vote? Trying to keep our priorities straight, let’s work together with our president and build our future.

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s