Could Diane Abbott REALLY end up leading Labour? If so, they’re DOOMED, Cap’n!

  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. Recent comments“The terrorist lackeys must be really crazy to suggest that politicians like Blair are guilty of any offence. Why don’t they go for the real terrorists and murderers who are trying to infiltrate and change the enlightened western world as we know it?” and “The best there’s been since I grew up and I’m nearly 70 now. ‘Tis a pity that some have just never grown up at all.” and “Tony Blair was an excellent PM and the world holds him in high esteem.” and “You were a great Prime Minister, you did your best and a strong Aly of America.”
  • Comment at end

    9th June 2010

    First the good news –



    Normally his quitting the race would make most middle-of-the-road people of any political persuasion happy. His recent boob over going back in time and assassinating Margaret Thatcher (watch here, and note the cheers!) wouldn’t have helped his cause. But his reasons for quitting have little to do with this, though it may have  spurred him on to reality.  Excepting Diane Abbott, McDonnell was simply the least popular amongst Labour MPs.

    It is clear that he and others on the left notice that with the Miliband Brothers and Ed Balls and Andy Burnham the so-called “Right” is dominating the field. The Left must unite and split the Right when it comes to the party’s vote.

    Now the bad news –

    It probably can. And the REALLY bad news – there is only Diane Abbott left on the traditional left.

    Well, if she scoops up McDonnell’s nomination votes, which she will, we may find that Labour activists rally round her for several reasons (excuses):
    • She is not male.
    • She is not forty-something – she was born in the same year as Tony Blair, 1953.
    • She is black.
    • She is on the left, and the present government is Conservative (mostly.)

    But she IS Oxbridge educated. (More on Abbott here)

    I make no bones about it, I dislike the woman. I dislike any politician, in fact anyone who says this You can only be bullied if you are weak”

    We should also remember this – she only supported the leaders of her own party until they did what SHE considered “the wrong thing”. Anyone who watched her salivate between summer 2006 and summer 2007 at the thought of Brown replacing Blair and by 2008  salivating again at the thought of Brown being removed as Blair had been, knows exactly her “principles.”

    She and Labour party members should never forget how lonely it was in the political wilderness for 18 years until Tony Blair rescued Labour by appealing to those who were NOT on the political Left.

    I do hope the Labour party grassroots gives her short shrift. But I fear they won’t. Then, sadly it’ll be the end of Labour, not just New Labour, as I suggested here two years ago.

    Video of Abbott saying“we can’t have all the leaders who look the same”.

    Pardon? You don’t mean we should judge by “looks” Ms Abbott?

    McDonnell’s ‘ASSASSINATE THATCHER’ remark

    Labour leadership contender John McDonnell has apologised after saying that if he could go back in time he would “assassinate Margaret Thatcher”.

    Ref McDonnell’s comment as covered at The Daily Politics here.

    In his defence, he made this comment in the ‘warm-up’ time before taking part in a radio programme. But it got more applause than anything else that was said later in the “battle of ideas”.

    The Conservative MP and friend of Lady Thatcher Conor Burns, Jeremy Corbyn MP – who is supporting Mr McDonnell in his leadership bid – and FT editor Lionel Barber discuss it here.

    Mr Burns, the Conservative panelist on the Daily Politics says that the left do a lot of this “sort of thing”.  He’s right, of course.  Some of us still recall with seething anger George Galloway in May 2006 on the “justification” of assassinating Tony Blair. (See here.) Also read Oliver Kamm’s thoughts on McDonnell and Galloway.

    As Lionel Barber from the FT says, “I found the applause more telling in some ways than the remarks. This tells you actually quite a lot about the current state of a large segment of the Labour party.”


    ‘The leader is chosen by an electoral college system made up of three sections – Labour MPs and MEPs, party members and members of affiliated unions and other affiliated organisations.

    People are balloted individually in each of the three sections, with the results from each of the three parts of the electoral college making up a third of the final result

    The result will be announced on the first day of the party conference on 25 September.

    Mr McDonnell, who had only 16 of the 33 nominations he needed, said he was pulling out to try to help Diane Abbott get on the ballot paper.

    She currently has 11 nominations. David Miliband, his brother Ed Miliband and Ed Balls have all secured the required support. Andy Burnham has 31.

    Nominations close at 1230 BST.


    Both Ms Abbott and Mr McDonnell are from the left of the Labour Party and argued they wanted to offer Labour and union members a choice when they come to vote in the contest in September.

    Explaining why he was pulling out of the race, Mr McDonnell said: “I stood for the Labour leadership as the candidate of the Left and trade union movement so that there could be a proper debate about Labour’s future in which all the wings of the party were fully represented.”‘

    Free Hit Counter


    Tags: , , , , , , , ,

    4 Responses to “Could Diane Abbott REALLY end up leading Labour? If so, they’re DOOMED, Cap’n!”

    1. David Marsh Says:

      I think that if Diana Abbott was elected as leader is would not allow Labour to make the same mistakes as in the past with left polities. I believe she would lead Labour to a new beginning which politics in Britain surely needs. That would throw up many challenges not least EU membership, however that is not insurmountable. Many other challenges await a new dimention in British politics not least engaging and uniting the British public and taking them along with new policies. One thing that the British people need in politics is some optimism for the future, not just for the young, but for all the British peole.

      • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

        Each to his own, Mr Marsh. Imho, for what it is worth, Labour is finished, dead, over – with Abbott leading. The Left is NOT the place for any party nowadays. Blair knew that, thus three wins. Would never have happened with a Leftist leader urging Unions et al on to greater depths.

    2. David Marsh Says:

      Yes. Each to his own. However no just Britain but the world needs a different set of values. Not the selfish ones which blair and thatcher subscribed to. If we are going to get out of the mess that the bankers and investors or should I say gamblers created, then we need to pool all of the resources of our nation not make the poor and pensioners and workers who did not create the problem pay the price. Already the alliance of tory and liberal are creating more unemployment and making the next generation pay for higher education. We need investment in the next generation nor penalties to get us out of this mess. More employment, creating more wealth so generating more employment. If Blairism and New Labour were going to get us out of trouble then they would have been elected. They did not have the vision to enthuse the public with optimism. I think Diane Abbot could well do that and getting rid of Trident is a step in the right direction.

      • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

        Mr Marsh,

        I completely disagree on YOUR analysis of ‘values’. Your judgement on Blair’s values, even Thatcher’s is wrong-headed, imho. Putting aside Thatcher’s values, was it selfish values that drove Blair to bring in a minimum wage? Was it selfish values which devolved power away from Westminster to Scotland and Wales? Was it selfish to spend almost half his first year as PM working on peace in Northern Ireland? Selfish to rid Sierra Leone of hand-chopping barbarians? To free Muslims from Christian ethnic cleansers in Kosovo?

        I don’t argue that we SHOULD expect the poor, pensioners and workers to pay the price of bank/global/financial downturn. Of course not. I am not impressed by the present coalition either. But we did not vote for this coalition. We got it by arrangement between the Con/Dems.

        Blair attracted million/billions to the City. He understood business, but of course Brown understood the economy, more or less.

        Btw, what does this mean – “If Blairism and New Labour were going to get us out of trouble then they would have been elected. They did not have the vision to enthuse the public with optimism.”

        Er – hate to have to remind you, but Tony Blair went three years ago. ‘Blairism’ was then diluted/drowned/lost for Brown’s own reasons, thus the fall in financial backing for the City when Blair went and the fall in financial backing from private donations to his party.

        The missing factor – LEADERSHIP.

        If you think Abbott can provide values-led and financial and economic leadership, well… good luck to you.

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


    Connecting to %s