ROBERT HARRIS is the ghost(writer), Part 1

by
  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here. Recent comments“The terrorist lackeys must be really crazy to suggest that politicians like Blair are guilty of any offence. Why don’t they go for the real terrorists and murderers who are trying to infiltrate and change the enlightened western world as we know it?” and “The best there’s been since I grew up and I’m nearly 70 now. ‘Tis a pity that some have just never grown up at all.” and “Tony Blair was an excellent PM and the world holds him in high esteem.” and “You were a great Prime Minister, you did your best and a strong Aly of America.”
  • Comment at end

    14th June 2010

    “THE GHOST” – WORTH EVERY PENNY

    Click to buy ‘The Ghost’, by Robert Harris

    (This paperback is the first edition,  published January 1st, 2007)

    A few days ago I came across a copy of Robert Harris’s novel “The Ghost”. At the knockdown price of a penny less than GBP£1, that’s about $1.44 in American,  I thought it might be worth splashing out.  Its price on the back cover is £12.99.

    It was hard to resist contributing to a local charity shop, especially since the book clearly hadn’t been opened by the previous owner.

    In case you are an innocent in this world of politics and writing about it, the hero/anti-hero of this book is not just any imaginary former prime minister. It is Tony Blair, former British prime minister.

    But before I go on, and on and on – and I will, this is only chapter one –

    THIS LITTLE TALE IS  FOR THE CURIOUS

    THOSE WHO WANT TO KNOW THE REAL GHOSTWRITER

    THE REAL GHOSTWRITER IS ROBERT HARRIS

    The ghosts of times past? 1997 Robert Harris (l) working for and talking with Tony Blair (r). Alastair Campbell is in the background.

    But before I explain why I have come to that conclusion on the unnamed ghostwriter of the book I have to admit, despite myself, that Harris’s book is –

    A PAGE TURNER

    It surprised me. This fiction/faction which still disturbs me for reasons mentioned here, was an enjoyable read. Or most of it. I did not enjoy the ending of chapter 15:

    “And that is my final image of Lang: a man always with his hand held out.  It is burned into my retina – his yearning shadow against the expanding ball of bright white fire that suddenly engulfed him…” (p.280)

    It evades me how anyone, unless their psychological state is unbalanced or their bitterness more deadly than  botulinum,  can write in this way of the imagined murder of a former colleague and, presumably, friend.  It takes a special kind of detachment. Or perhaps a thirst for revenge or power over the “powerful”.  Possibly all three. “Justice”  or the lack of it, doesn’t enter the equation.

    But the book’s still a page-turner. Despite its inconsistencies and endless “We ALL Know” thrashing around for A.N. Other conspiracy behind the last one, it leaves Polanski’s movie version in its wake.

    So, praise where it’s due. Harris is an entertaining writer, using similes frequently and effectively. He has an admirably  self-serving way of suffusing content with his own opinions through the mouths of his characters added to by the suitably described isolation and bleakness of the main setting and the use of some cogent, familiar references. Disregard for a second that his opinions are a touch suspect. He rises to the task he has set himself. And the book is an easy read, moving along apace.

    OK, second’s out.

    REGARDING HARRIS’S MOTIVES

    Apart from cashing in disreputably, in a roman-a-clef fashion, you need to REGARD closely that Harris has his own, strong and very suspect opinions on the real-life former prime minister and his motives for joining the USA in the war in Iraq.  Harris’s own motives for this highly coloured look at that decision are shared by many a Guardian reader. Harris is their spokesman.

    You also need to know the task Harris has set himself and his reasons.

    They are the same reasons that every “Blair is a war criminal” accusor has for waving placards.  They are multitudinous and destructive in every way possible, while pretending to be the opposite. They are  – disappointment, anti-war, anti-big business, anti-America, anti-leadership, anti-power, anti-noticing an enemy in this liberal-thinking land, denial.  In fact it’s tough to find anything positive in their reasons.  They are ‘anti’ by nature.  Apart, that is, from the positive certainty that “truth” will out, and that somehow all will be well with the world once one particular character is out of it.

    THE UNNAMED GHOSTWRITER?

    I conclude that this book IS about a ghostwriter or would-be ghostwriter as much as it is about the so-called “war criminal”  and former British Prime Minister.

    It is about the ghostwriter that Harris would LOVE to have been for Mr Blair.

    Except he wasn’t asked.

    It’s the “look what you missed” jibe at his former employer, who has had the audacity to think he can write his own book, “The Journey”, out in September (pre-order here); no ghostwriter; all longhand; no computer.

    I conclude that this is a self-serving book, as much as it is a holier-than-thou, supercilious – “here’s the full inside story” – tome, compiled from “sources” and laying down markers for the future using regurgitated “facts” about the rumoured possible criminal acts of one of the world’s most respected politicians.

    It is clearly both, and a lot more beside.

    Despite the honest, seemingly empathic ghostwriter’s thoughts at the end just after the assassination of Lang –

    “…worse … was my sense of guilt”  […] “It nagged away at me as I lay in the darkness. I just couldn’t erase the memory of how bleak he had looked on the plane at the very end.” (p. 286)

    – I am still left with the sinking feeling that if the real former prime minister were ever to meet the tragic fate of Lang, Harris would express no more than a “what did we expect” melancholic sympathy.

    He would take no responsibility. He would feel no shame. He would feel no guilt.

    After all, he, or rather his ghostwriter character actually “liked” the assassinated former PM of the book.

    I imagine Harris could find it in his heart to say the same about the real one.

    [Next? ‘Robert Harris IS the ghost(writer), Part 2. Disclaimers Unlimited’]


    TALKING ABOUT TRUTH

    You can pre-order the real thing here at Amazon – “A Journey: My Political Life” by Tony Blair, out September 2010

    But if you’re expecting this particular author to write about doing away with colleagues, forget it.

    Back to top




    Free Hit Counter


    Advertisements

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

    5 Responses to “ROBERT HARRIS is the ghost(writer), Part 1”

    1. Robert Harris IS the ghost(writer), Part 2. Disclaimers Unlimited « Tony Blair Says:

      […] But there are many clever literary moments too.  Some moving, some disconcerting.  His descriptive eye is good at setting atmosphere. I’ll do Harris the justice of pointing these up from time to time and in a later post. He IS a good writer, as noted here (part 1) […]

    2. Shanti Thomas Says:

      I watched the film Ghost Writer and must declare I was opposed to the invasion of Iraq it was an interesting clever film and that USA were not part of the International War Crimes treaty. The plot about Cherie Blair well I took it as the Blairs were heavily under America’s Bush influence but who am I ?
      Robin Cooke was being over-ruled and the labour majority in parliament did nothing which was the most dreadful sign about a party that appeared to stand for human rights in platitudes only and manipulating the british public internal policies elsewhere. The message from campaigners at the time was Not in my name …not in Britain’s name?
      Politicians governments are in positions of dreadful power in light of terrorism wars and many other far reaching social financial policies etc and are ultimately responsible for their our actions. Decisions like the Iraq War left many dead when 9/11 was about Bin Laden elsewhere… what was damning about the invasion was the public opposed to the war were left nowhere and the labour MP’s representatives avoided- other parties didnt have a voice that was heard at the time when it could and should have made a difference.

      • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

        Shanti Thomas.

        They estimate 1 million took part in marches. That is one sixtieth of the UK population, probably one thirtieth of the voting population.
        The rest of us – the huge majority – VOTE for politicans to decide. They did.

        Robin Cook was very much “ON BOARD” for another intervention without a UN resolution – Kosovo. Why do people not describe him as a “warmongering war criminal”?

        Robert Harris used and abused his position as a trusted friend/colleague of Tony Blair’s. Harris should be seen for what he is – money-grubbing on a populist cause aginst Mr Blair.

        Are all the ongoing killings in Iraq still the fault of Tony Blair? Or are they evidence that HE was right regarding the fundamental issue that there are many in those countries (viz Afghanistan/Syria/Libya) who have allowed their so-called “religious” demands to outweigh their humanity? In this global world of Islamist terrorism responsible politicians MUST not turn and look the other way.

        Almost every authoritative organisation/spy network believed Saddam still had WMD, including the UN, Hans Blix and Dr David Kelly. Why are none of those accused of “war crimes”?

        I could go on.

    3. castle defense 2 hack Says:

      Great beat ! I wish to apprentice even as you amend your site,
      how can i subscribe for a weblog web site? The account helped me a applicable deal.
      I were a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered
      brilliant clear idea

    4. parrots Says:

      But time was almost running out so i misinterpreted the process.
      Pellets have a lot of much more nutritional vitamins and minerals that will assist your parrot keep wholesome, dwell lengthier and have far more general electricity.
      Chet Womack addresses how his approaches work in the “Taming, Training and Tricks” DVD.

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s