To be Honest, Ed – we’re not all in your “new generation”


28th September 2010


Sean O’Grady at The Independent has it absolutely right. “Cobblers”, he neatly puts it.


There is NO merit in the under 40s running anything. In fact that prospect is chock full of demerits. It is high time politics was grasped back from the hands of the immature and shallow of thinking. From such as Mili-E.

This, by Ed Miliband, was pure ageism.  Perhaps surprising to some in the supposedly politically correct Labour Party. The Labour party of the election winner Tony Blair who always, always, always reached out to all generations. Even Gordon Brown reached out, when he thought of it. Or at least he never committed this discriminatory error.


Who? Why? What? His predecessors as party leaders are not exactly doddering old codgers lounging around in their armchairs. On second thoughts, Mili-E has probably got them turning in their graves over this. I can but hope so, and expect to see them rise again soon to haunt the whippersnapper.

Tony Blair was actually all of FIVE months older than Ed Miliband is today when the former first became party leader. I never once heard him referring to his party as a “New Generation”. HIS New Labour party was for ALL generations.

Of course Ed might have had an alternative target in view. He might have been suggesting that big brother David is actually past it. After all he’s all of FORTY FIVE, FGS!

To be honest,  I don’t think I’ve heard a worse speech for positioning, repetition, or deviation. A touch of hesitation before speaking would have been useful.  But thinking, clearly, wasn’t in LITTLE MILI’S script. As wasn’t any positive reference to those new OLD Labourites who aren’t exactly of the younger generation. Those who incidentally can be relied upon to turn out to vote; those who make up the bulk of every political party’s membership and activists. Those over 50, even over 60.

This speech was nothing less than disgraceful. Miliband D should be demanding a recount on that election business the Unions rigged the other day.

O’Grady also says in his “Miliband’s ‘new generation’ cobblers” –

Imagine if Ed Miliband had got up in his leader’s speech and said “let the message go out that the whites are in charge now” or “the torch has passed, and it’s us blokes who’ll be running this show from now on. Goodbye, ladies”.

It is AGEISM cobblers. And if the Labour party had a scintilla of honour at least ONE of those interviewed by the broadcasters and news journalists would have pointed this out.


Why? Who does he think he is? Does the 40-year-old Miliband, who has been around in politics for more than 20 years think he is fresh out of high school? Untarnished by the slings and arrows? Innocent by his own dis-association? Does he think he is Pitt the Younger? If so, he should read up. Even today Ed Miliband is 16 years older than that particular PM was when he took power. Judging by this astonishingly bad effort today Mili-Ed will be 140 before he gets anywhere near sufficiently mature to run a country.

I suggest Ed M. needs to be reported to the Equal Opportunities Commission and asked to explain himself and then apologise to the public of ALL ages. It is not in the interests of democracy that a political leader tries to instil in the public the notion that age should make any difference to one’s human or political value.

And this moan of mine is before I get to lambast him over his Iraq betrayal.


It was most instructive that the camera was on David Miliband, Alistair Darling and Andy Burnham as Mili-E said “we were wrong about Iraq”. NOT one of them joined the audience’s applause. Alan Johnson was behind them. His hands could not be seen but there was no movement suggestive of applause.

Mili-E: “Iraq was an issue that divided our party and our country. Many sincerely believed that the world faced a real threat. I criticise nobody faced with making the toughest of decisions and I honour our troops who fought and died there. But I do believe that we were wrong. Wrong to take Britain to war and we need to be honest about that.”

They were wrong to allow you, Mili-E to take over their party. We need to be honest about that.

Jack Straw said in a broadcast interview that he disagreed with Ed M on Iraq, saying that decisions have to be taken prospectively, without the benefit of hindsight.

With the benefit of hindsight a LOT of things would be different today. Very different.


The Sun’s Trevor Kavanagh said at the end of PM tonight that he “knew” that David Miliband would announce that he would not serve in Mili-E’s shadow cabinet. I suppose he’s realised that at 45 he’s far too old.
Back to top

Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

Recent comments:
“Mr. Blair is one of the finest politicians to have had the priviledge of serving the United Kingdom, and Britons are fortunate to have had him as their Prime Minister. Time will show that Mr. Blair’s approach to affairs in the Middle East were and remain correct. From a member of the Commonwealth, thank you, Mr. Blair, for your continued service to legitimate and lasting (and not convenient or politically expedient) freedom.”
AND – “Tony Blair was the greatest Prime Minister since Winston Churchill and the only regret I have he didn’t get my vote as I live in Canada.”
AND – I am sick and tired of television and radio interviewers asking the same old questions over and over, regarding the decision to go to war in Iraq, presumably they hope Mr Blair will let slip some secret information which they would then use against him. History will show if the decision was the right one, (I believe it was) but people must accept that Tony Blair is a honourable man, and made his decision based on the known facts and not with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.”


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “To be Honest, Ed – we’re not all in your “new generation””

  1. Peter Reynolds Says:

    Gott in Himmel! Der Englander ist geworzichunsteilung!

    (As they used to say in the “Combat Zone” handy size comic books)

    What have you done? Where have you gone? Are you in disguise? Where is my single issue, keeptonyblairforpm hero?

    I know good ol’ Tone did get a mention but only in passing! Is this permissible? Is it excusable?

    Might as well face it though – we’re past it. Well you are anyway. I ‘m clinging on by my finger nails, sustained only by huge doses of narcotics.

    Incidentally, what was that I heard about you and the Treasurer’s job and the 19 year old research assistant?

    Ach so. Der Englander ist kaput!

    • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

      Was ist ‘geworzichunsteilung’, mein herr?

      I suppose I could take a guess.

      This blog is a kind of narrative of Blair AND his enemies. And this Milipede is ONE BIG ENEMY. His expedient populist rubbish today on Iraq has helped his brother make up his mind. I bet you he’s outta there!

      Of course in reality he only said the same on policy, values and direction as Blair did. This is important, even though most punters haven’t realised it yet. I’ll be back about our boy soon, don’t worry. He’s not up to much of course – just meeting Palestinians and Israelis right now, over … well, something or other.

      I’ll ignore your jibes. Anyway, as you say, I’m past it, clearly.

    • Peter Reynolds Says:

      What’s the latest on the Prince of Darkness? I miss his disconcerting presence and those weird atmospherics and fluctuations in the Force which permeate throughout the land whenever he graces us with his presence.

      And when is good ol’ Tone going to endorse EdM? He’s got to eventually, surely? Perhaps a surprise end of conference finale? Ed and Tone, shoulder to shoulder, arms held aloft in celebration, lapping up the adulation of Gillian Duffy and her chums? Is this what’s planned for this afternoon?

      I don’t think you’re all washed up just yet. I’m told even us old codgers can respond to some of these 19 year old research assistants. New training course I understand…

      • keeptonyblairforpm Says:

        Peter, Peter M is keeping his counsel. Waiting for the fallout when David M bows out.

        Meanwhile, according to the Guardian, it seems Brown rang me – John Prescott, rather – to try to impress upon me, er, JP, that I… he shouldn’t talk up David the Mili. Drafting on it right now.

        Tony will NOT, I am almost 100% sure back the Idiot they now have running (down) their party and its policies. Unless of course the Prince of Darkness is mixing up an irresistible concoction, again.

  2. Peter Reynolds Says:

    What is this irritating pop up window on your site? Some new widget or another? I hate it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s