BBC’s “impartiality” complaint. Findings delayed until AFTER Blair’s appearance at the Iraq Inquiry

  • Original Home Page – And another very early post from this blog
  • Current Latest Page
  • All Contents of Site – Index
  • Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here
  • Comment at end

    Or –

    19th January 2011

    Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

    BBC’s Iraq Inquiry coverage (and impartiality rules) under scrutiny – UPDATE


    In my post last November I reported that the BBC Trust were considering a complaint that an interview with the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg during coverage of Tony Blair’s last appearance at the Iraq inquiry had breached the BBC’s impartiality rules. This was because her erroneous version of Sir Christopher Meyer’s “signed in blood” testimony chimed with that of the anti-war lobby and because the interview was held against a backdrop of “BLiar” placards.

    The website publication of the BBC Trust’s findings was expected this week but I have just learnt that this has now been put back until Thursday of next week.

    Tony Blair is due to make his second appearance at the inquiry on Friday this week.

    Any connection between the delayed publication of a possibly embarrassing BBC Trust finding on this matter and the date of Tony Blair’s next appearance at the inquiry?

    As the Urquhart character in the House of Cards series put it “you might very well think that. But of course I couldn’t possibly comment”.



    BBC report with comments on Mr Blair’s last appearance at the Iraq Inquiry, 29th January, 2010. Here are two tweets and two comments – just for the flavour:

    • BBCLauraK tweets: Protesters outside can be heard in here – they claimed they were going to try to stop Blair leaving when day finishes at 5.
    • aincorby tweets: Is four-square behind Tony Blair. Leadership is never easy; we should support the judgement of our prime minister in international affairs.
    • I am getting tired of all the comments about ‘tame questioning’. Mr Blair has proved today that he should still be our prime minister. We are lucky that in the United Kingdom such a public enquiry as this can take place. Thatcher led us into an unnecessary Falklands war, one which Callaghan avoided on several occasions before her – she would not have dealt with this line of questioning and would not have attended.
    • He is a brave man and history will judge him as such, especially when our delay to make firm decision on the current Iran issue will come to haunt us.

    I remember 29th January well.  It was a drizzly London Friday.  I was there. In fact I was a witness (more or less) to the TRIAL of Tony Blair, aka the Iraq Inquiry.  And I will be there again this Friday.

    Back to top

    Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’


    Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

    Recent comments:

    “All countries need a leader who isn’t afraid to fight terrorism. I believe Mr. Blair did a necessary job in helping his allies. Are we all just supposed to lie down and wait for them to come for us, I don’t think so.”

    And – “Mr. Blair is one of the finest politicians to have had the privilege of serving the United Kingdom, and Britons are fortunate to have had him as their Prime Minister. Time will show that Mr. Blair’s approach to affairs in the Middle East were and remain correct. From a member of the Commonwealth, thank you, Mr. Blair, for your continued service to legitimate and lasting (and not convenient or politically expedient) freedom.”

    AND – “Tony Blair was the greatest Prime Minister since Winston Churchill and the only regret I have he didn’t get my vote as I live in Canada.”

    AND – “I am sick and tired of television and radio interviewers asking the same old questions over and over, regarding the decision to go to war in Iraq, presumably they hope Mr Blair will let slip some secret information which they would then use against him. History will show if the decision was the right one, (I believe it was) but people must accept that Tony Blair is an honourable man, and made his decision based on the known facts and not with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.”

    Free Hit Counter


    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    One Response to “BBC’s “impartiality” complaint. Findings delayed until AFTER Blair’s appearance at the Iraq Inquiry”

    1. BBC’s sneering Paxman carpeted as “partial” by Helen Boaden, via Stan Rosenthal « The Feral Press Says:

      […] […]

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


    Connecting to %s