Archive for the ‘British Prime Minister’ Category

Tony Blair is still a busy boy

March 21, 2012

All blog posts 2012 + Original posts list: from 2006 to 2012

Click to tweet this post

Comment at end

Today Tony Blair is in Brussels. More on that here.

Yesterday he was in Westminster at the Queen’s Jubilee. More on that just below.

On Monday he was in London speaking on the future of Africa – (Speech as published in The Times here.  

It’s hardly surprising if he doesn’t always know which door he’s supposed to be going through.

LONDON, Tuesday March 20, 2012: Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair attends Queen Elizabeth II address to both Houses of Parliament at Westminster Hall. (Photo by Toby Melville - WPA Pool/Getty Images)

The media had some fun and games watching who was sitting next to whom and why in Westminster Hall as the Queen gave a speech to both Houses of Parliament to mark her 60 years on the throne. Avoiding fisticuffs between Messrs Blair & Brown was as usual, the preferred explanation for placing the speaker’s wife between the two former Prime Ministers.  Since they have been seated next to each other at several high-profile events in recent times, without any sign of blood, this was an entirely invented excuse for twitterblab. As it happened Sally Bercow, the Speaker’s wife, got a lovely picture or two for her album. I can even see the caption now – ‘Sally between two last Labour Prime Ministers’.  Hmm – did I mean “last two”?  No –  “two last”.

There were one or two other notable pictures at the event of our politicians.

THE KALEIDOSCOPE IS SHAKING ME

For instance, this one of David Cameron scowling somewhat at the speech by the Speaker in which he mentioned “kaleidoscope” three times. I ventured to tweet that three reminders of Tony Blair’s “the kaleidoscope has been shaken …  pieces in flux” might have been three too many for Mr Cameron. In fact he was rather more likely to have been annoyed because Mr Bercow was publicising his own favourite charity. The Queen’s speech to both Houses was not a hijacking occasion.

But you really WILL have to learn to hide your distaste better, Mr Cameron. I know, I know - John Bercow is a Blairite Tory. He isn't the only one, as you well know. Anyway, Tony would never have scowled like that; even at Gordon.

And then there was this straightening things up moment as they waited for Her Majesty to arrive.

David Cameron and Ed Miliband, leader of the Labour party, adjust their ties. REUTERS/John Stillwell/pool.

There were several pictures of Tony Blair in conversation with Ed Miliband. The latter now seeks the valued advice of the former, regularly. Naturally. But I rather enjoy pondering on the conversation or lack of in this one. More pictures here at DayLife

Former prime minister Tony Blair talks with Britain's opposition Labour Party leader Ed Miliband. Photo: JOHN STILLWELL/AFP/Getty Images

BBC: Pictures of the Queen’s Jubilee event at Westminster Hall

Back to top

__________

AHLC Report: Agenda in support of Palestinian Economic Sustainability and Institution Building

Source

Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 in Office of Tony Blair, Office of the Quartet Representative

AHLC Report: Agenda in support of Palestinian Economic Sustainability and Institution Building

Read the full report for the meeting of the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee on Office of the Quartet Representative Development Agenda in support of Palestinian Economic Sustainability and Institution Building

Quartet Representative Tony Blair said: 

“This AHLC meeting in Brussels comes at a profoundly important time for the Palestinian Authority (PA). Amid a steep fiscal crisis, slowing economic trends and continuing political uncertainty, policy reforms and institution-building plans implemented by Prime Minister Salam Fayyad are coming under increasing financial strain.

“While efforts continue to resume Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, it is important in the coming period to redouble our efforts to shore up the fiscal position of the Palestinian Authority and to re-energize the Palestinian economy.

“Sustaining economic growth and job creation in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip will require new actions by various parties. These actions should aim at boosting investor confidence and further unlock the immense potential of the Palestinian private sector.

“My development agenda in 2012 focuses on seven thematic areas related to the economic growth and institution-building, specifically:

  • Private sector development
  • Promoting movement, access and trade facilitation
  • Area C development
  • Reconstructing and opening up Gaza economically;
  • Improving living and business conditions in East Jerusalem;
  • Improving the rule of law covering the judicial and security sectors;
  • Strengthening the PA fiscal position.

“The goal of this development agenda, again, is to catalyse significant economic change on the ground to give greater oxygen to the political negotiation process. So the ‘ground-up’ economic agenda will continue to provide critical support to the ‘top-down’ political process.”

OQR’s Key Priorities in 2012

In 2012, Quartet Representative Tony Blair’s key priorities within this development agenda focus on four areas:

  • Working with the PA to resolve the short-term and medium-term energy problems in Gaza;
  • Promoting greater Palestinian trade flows between Gaza, the West Bank, and international markets;
  • Promoting Area C development through agreed fast-tracking mechanisms and the active participation of local Palestinian communities;
  • Pressing for greater direct budget support from regional and international donors to help the PA overcome its acute fiscal crisis.

__________

AFRICA (source)

The following oped by Tony Blair first appeared in The Times on Monday 19 March 2012.

For most of my first term as Prime Minister, bad news about Africa was all I heard. Brutal conflict engulfed Sierra Leone and Liberia. Rwanda was emerging from a genocide that had decimated its population. It was the era of Drop the Debt: petitions and letters piled up in Downing Street for the campaign. As ever, the British public gave their support generously, but perhaps with a sense that the problems were intractable, that this was the same old African story.

But I was always an optimist about Africa. I believed that things would and could be different. Now, 15 years later, they are. Africa is on the move. And to keep up with a changing Africa we need new thinking and new approaches.

Africa’s economies are booming. Over the past decade, six of the world’s ten fastest-growing countries were African. In eight of the past ten years, sub-Saharan Africa has grown faster than East Asia. Aid has helped: the doubling of aid to Africa that I championed at Gleneagles in 2005 has strengthened, not stymied Africa’s progress. Africa has seen the largest recent turnaround in poverty of any region, malaria rates have fallen by a fifth in the past decade, and rates of HIV-Aids have plummeted.

The debt relief campaign has liberated African economies from the burden of indebtedness, allowing them to compete globally. Government funds that once went to service debt now go on public services. In Nigeria, a country of 170 million people, 70 per cent of whom live on less than $1.25 a day, the millions saved have been piled back into healthcare, with vaccination levels rising from 10 per cent to 65 per cent in places. Thousands of lives have been saved each year. And the progress on malaria, Aids and measles is spread right across the continent.

Africa is also benefiting from the movement of capital, skills, and technology, particularly from the new economic powerhouses of China, Brazil and India; taking the best of what has been learnt the hard way by West and East and applying it from Maputo to Monrovia.

However, the main thing changing Africa is Africa itself. There is one indispensable thing that cannot be imported: government. Here, too, things have improved. The number of democracies in sub-Saharan Africa has skyrocketed from three in 1989 to 23 in 2008. Since 1991, African governments have been defeated at the ballot box 30 times. Between the 1960s and 1991 that happened only once. To seize this moment, African governments across the continent must step up to lead the way. I see a new generation of leaders emerging, ready to take their countries’ destinies into their own hands, no longer dependent on outside assistance. This is achievable. I believe that we can end African countries’ dependence on aid within a generation. But it will need a new approach, a new partnership between developed and developing world.

This new approach has three elements. First, African governments need the capacity to deliver tangible results for their citizens. Democracy is spreading and deepening across the continent, but too often democratically elected leaders come to power on a wave of popular enthusiasm only to find that they lack the government institutions to implement the changes their people expect. African governments must be supported to build the systems and institutions they need to get things done. I set up my charity, the Africa Governance Initiative, which now has projects in five countries, to provide exactly that support, but the lesson is much wider and should become integral to our approach to development.

Second, Africa needs a vibrant private sector. Development will only become self-sustaining when it is based on a private sector that creates jobs, opportunities and incomes. And the private sector can only thrive when the right infrastructure is in place: roads to bring goods to market; airports and ports to enable trade; and behind all this, power to switch on the lights to make commerce possible. These aren’t new points. But, as Bill Gates told G20 leaders last year, infrastructure development must be prioritised, by African governments and their partners.

Third, we need a new way of rich and poor countries working together. The old way, where the rich world gives and the poor world passively receives, is an anachronism. African countries must be in the driving seat of their own development, setting priorities and making decisions. Where aid is needed, it should get behind these priorities to strengthen governments’ own systems.

These changes in how we work with Africa are necessary. But perhaps the biggest change that is needed is less tangible: a change in our expectations. Too often when we think of Africa we conjure up outdated images of a generation ago. In trying to galvanise global support for aid, I admit I played my part in this, characterising Africa as a scar on the conscience of the world. But Africa today is moving forward at a dizzying pace; our attitudes, how we think of, and talk about Africa must keep pace. I look forward to the day when people open a newspaper to read about African entrepreneurs creating jobs, African researchers developing breakthrough technologies, African elections running smoothly and think … this is the way I expect it to be.

_____

Also see –  A New Approach to a New Africa

_____

Back to top

Tweet this post   –  Follow Blair Supporter on Twitter

Tony Blair’s Desert Island Discs choices (download audio)

December 28, 2011

Comment at end

Or –

28th December 2011

Tony Blair’s BBC Desert Island Discs, November 1996

Sue Lawley’s castaway this week is the Leader of the Opposition, the Right Honourable Tony Blair. He will be describing his beliefs, both political and religious, and revealing the man behind the sound bites.

[Taken from the original programme material for this archive edition of Desert Island Discs]

Rt Hon Tony Blair MP

Broadcast 24 November 1996

Official Leader of the Opposition (became Prime Minister in 1997), Politician – Labour

Find another castaway here

  • Desert Island Discs – Find every castaway from 1942 to the present day, plus over 500 programmes available to download.

Back to top

Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

_______________

Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

Recent comments:

I am staggered by all the hate directed towards our former Prime Minister. I believe that Tony Blair made the Iraq decision in good faith and is most certainly NOT a war criminal. If anyone should be tried at the Hague it should be those in the media for totally misrepresenting the information and facts. The media are to blame for fuelling this hatred as it is purely driven by them. (UK)

__________
The greatest and most successful leader the Labour Party has ever had with the courage to fight the Islamist terrorists who really would like to kill us all, and you never hear a good word about him. The herd of independent minds, commentators, activists etc who have never had to make a difficult decision in their lives drown out all debate with their inane chants of war crimes and blood on his hands. Defend him at every chance. I just wish more people would do it. (Glasgow, UK)
__________
Blair was the greatest Labour Prime Minister. It is a disgrace that the party has turned away from his legacy. Shame on Ed Miliband and his so-called ‘new generation’.

Carole Caplin to BBC’s Huw Edwards – “There is no book” (Blairs’ sex secrets)

November 2, 2011

Comment at end

Or –

2nd November 2011

Caplin on Daily Mail lies, after winning her libel case –

“THERE IS NO BOOK”

Did you get that little bit in the news coverage yesterday?

There is – nor was there ever going to be  – a book? No? Thought not.

And yet this “book” suggestion was one of the juicier what-ifs that Alison Boshoff the Daily Mail journalist (quoted on page 3 of the High Court case file) enticed her rabid readers with:

The Blairs have always been worried that the former exotic dancer might ‘push the nuclear button’ and write a book about her extraordinary association with them. Crucially, what might Miss Caplin – still in immaculate shape at 48 – say about the secrets of the Blair marriage? She joined them when Mr Blair was on the brink of being elected Labour leader and quickly made an intimate connection. She’s said to have insisted Mrs Blair tell her every last detail of their sex life, and even prescribed a sex regime which apparently resulted in the birth of baby Leo.”

WHEN IS A BOOK NOT A BOOK?

WHEN IT DOESN’T EXIST, SILLY

If you didn’t see the interview with Carole Caplin on BBC 24 hours news yesterday you won’t know that Ms Caplin has even mentioned a ‘book’.   She was interviewed by the BBC newscaster Huw Edwards. The poor guy couldn’t get his head round the facts.  He thought he was about to interview her about her much (falsely) heralded “book”.  He had to double-check with Ms Caplin that there WAS no such book. In fact she offered to leave the studio if he was only interested in the non-existent contents of a non-existent book!

Some weeks ago we got an apology from the Mail.  It apologised, in its way, for suggesting that Carole Caplin would break the Blair’s confidence. It also accepted there was nothing improper … massages … Tony, etc.

In its ‘Clarifications and corrections’ on 26th October 2011 the Daily Mail had this –

An article about Carole Caplin on 18 September 2010 ‘Carole’s £1m question: Will she tell all about Blairs’ sex secrets?’ suggested that Ms Caplin might reveal intimate details about Tony and Cherie Blair in a book for a substantial sum, which might lift the lid on their marriage and finish the Blairs. We accept that Ms Caplin would not disclose such matters and that there was nothing improper about massages she gave Mr Blair. We apologise to Ms Caplin.

In other words goes the between-the-lines inference – Ms Caplin knows/did … something or other … but she is honourable and won’t tell anything or … er… nothing!

In my ‘book’ this is insufficient apology.

£1,000,000 SATISFACTION?  I DO  HOPE SO

Still, Ms Caplin has had her legal costs paid and has been awarded a satisfactory sum in damages. It should be, at least, Carole’s £1m answer.

By the way the disgraceful article has, of course, been removed from the Daily MaUl’s website (though I think I may have it in one of my many drafts. Must take a look one day.)

Ms Caplin’s lawyer, David Price, said on Tuesday she “never had any intention of disclosing any confidential information concerning the Blairs” and “did not possess any sex secrets” about them. So that is some sort of reference to publishing er, something or other. Which she didn’t and wouldn’t, even if she could. Got it? Good.

More biased BBC coverage

Earlier on BBC Radio4 News at 10 fleeting mention was made that Ms Caplin had won her case. Again it was in the light of “her” innocence – not (also) that of Mr & Mrs Blair.  A trifle dishonourable of the Beeb, don’t you think?

“Carole Caplin said it was offensive to suggest she would break the Blairs trust”

RELATED

See the full Caplin Vs Associated Newspapers case at the High Court, on 20th June 2011, between Carole Caplin, Claimant and Associated Newspapers Limited, Defendant.

The story is here at The Independent and at The Guardian.  Neither of them mentions the “book”.

EARLIER POSTS AT THIS BLOG

Back to top

Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

_______________

Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

Recent comments:

I am staggered by all the hate directed towards our former Prime Minister. I believe that Tony Blair made the Iraq decision in good faith and is most certainly NOT a war criminal. If anyone should be tried at the Hague it should be those in the media for totally misrepresenting the information and facts. The media are to blame for fuelling this hatred as it is purely driven by them. (UK)

__________
The greatest and most successful leader the Labour Party has ever had with the courage to fight the Islamist terrorists who really would like to kill us all, and you never hear a good word about him. The herd of independent minds, commentators, activists etc who have never had to make a difficult decision in their lives drown out all debate with their inane chants of war crimes and blood on his hands. Defend him at every chance. I just wish more people would do it. (Glasgow, UK)
__________
Blair was the greatest Labour Prime Minister. It is a disgrace that the party has turned away from his legacy. Shame on Ed Miliband and his so-called ‘new generation’.

Which Muslim Women Does Lauren Booth speak for? [Guest Post from Ms Jupiter]

October 31, 2011

Comment at end

Or –

31st October 2011

Below is a guest post by a freelance writer.

_____

Nowadays there is a familiar face of a woman in hijab that frequently graces the pages of many daily British newspapers.

Lauren Booth attends a protest against islamophobia and racism organised by the Islamic Central Council of Switzerland (ICCS), in Bern October 29, 2011. REUTERS/Michael Buholzer (SWITZERLAND)

Her name is Lauren Booth and like the name suggests she is English.

So who is this lady and why does she appear so often in newspapers like the Daily Mail and the Guardian? By looking at her one might guess that she has opinions on herself and why she chose to be the way she is.  It may well be a case where she will have her own life story as a milestone to share with others.  Anything that she will say will be marked with a strong conviction about adopting an ideology which will give her some sort of identity.

But wherever Ms Booth’s name appears there is another name that follows: that of her brother-in-law Tony Blair, the former British prime minister. The press for obvious reasons have relished the idea of pairing the two of them. And all sorts of conjuring thoughts have been paired together to suggest just how bizarre it is that both of them are related.

One of them is the support for the Palestinian state.

Tony Blair at the moment is assigned as the Mideast Quartet representative; to oversee the efforts to resolve issues for the statehood for both the Israelis and the Palestinians. Lauren Booth has chosen to classify herself as a pro-Palestinian activist, which has earned her a lot of acknowledgment in some Muslim countries. In addition to this she has made it publicly known of her criticism of Tony Blair for the Iraq war intervention.

Tony Blair with Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad to discuss peace negotiations

When it comes to her conversion to Islam Lauren Booth is very vocal about it and has been going around the globe giving talks on a western woman’s perspective about converting to Islam.

Lauren Booth at a news conference next to Majjati, the wife of a Salafist Muslim in jail, in Morocco October 26, 2011. Booth, who converted to Islam late last year, is the sister-in-law of former British premier Tony Blair. Picture taken October 26, 2011. REUTERS/Stringer (MOROCCO)

Time and again she comes in the media as a face and a voice to endorse the so-called perspective which will give a stamp of identity, if Islam is adopted as a means to wear it as a distinctive badge. The voices of adulations praising her efforts are many. In fact too many. They have all praised her as an example of what Islam should be if a woman chooses to come in the public wearing a covering over her head. She has on numerous occasions spread the word on how illuminated she felt during an experience which transformed her into a new person, and finally led her to accept Islam.

She is the brand of new converts to Islam in the Western world. These women encouraged by their own experiences then seek to advance their own knowledge by speaking out about it. It will not be a surprise that many women coming from Muslim countries to the US and Europe are influenced by their views and then seek to be transformed in the same manner, as if their former experiences had little bearing to who they were and where they came from. They are taken aback by these new convert women’s rich experiences and seem to downcast their own identity. My question to such women would be must we give in to what others have to preach about Islam? Some of us come from Muslim countries, where the culture and its values have given us a homogenous Islamic atmosphere. Why do we have to feel we are any less if we do not confine ourselves to what others believe about Islam?

It may not go amiss if women like Lauren Booth go around the Muslim world and talk to women for the need to educate themselves in a way that they become constructive members of their societies, learning to participate with other communities; because more importantly it is the need to build bridges and foster good relations between different communities that is needed in today’s world. What good is an education that is fostering segregation? How far can you go if you believe in it?! And what about the Muslim women who do not believe in segregation? Are we to feel deprived and less fortunate than the ones who are the way Lauren Both is? The badge of humility seems to be missing when Lauren Booth chooses to stand in front of a congregation at a university to speak out about her own experiences. That is an easy option and probably something that gets her attention straight away. Reaching out to communities and trying to change their perspectives is a hands-on job and much harder.

She is outspoken about her criticism on Tony Blair.  But would she be famous if she were not related to Tony Blair? Without that link her conversion probably would not have taken her so far.  But if I were her, and I was genuine I would have objected to having my name placed next to a person of whom I disapproved.  I would have stood up for my own identity and would have insisted people know me as who I am and not because of who I am related to.

Ends

Ms Jupiter

__________

Back to top

Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

_______________

Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

Recent comments:

I am staggered by all the hate directed towards our former Prime Minister. I believe that Tony Blair made the Iraq decision in good faith and is most certainly NOT a war criminal. If anyone should be tried at the Hague it should be those in the media for totally misrepresenting the information and facts. The media are to blame for fuelling this hatred as it is purely driven by them. (UK)

__________
The greatest and most successful leader the Labour Party has ever had with the courage to fight the Islamist terrorists who really would like to kill us all, and you never hear a good word about him. The herd of independent minds, commentators, activists etc who have never had to make a difficult decision in their lives drown out all debate with their inane chants of war crimes and blood on his hands. Defend him at every chance. I just wish more people would do it. (Glasgow, UK)
__________
Blair was the greatest Labour Prime Minister. It is a disgrace that the party has turned away from his legacy. Shame on Ed Miliband and his so-called ‘new generation’.

The boy, man or men who killed Gaddafi

October 29, 2011

Comment at end

Or –

28th October 2011

Debating with tweeps who defend Gaddafi’s killer

Forget the sodomist for now (see here if you can’t forget)

But before the tweepery – a song … “All you need is love – da da ra da ra…”

... or an underage killer with 'love' on his t-shirt?

“I shot Gaddafi” – says “the boy with the golden gun”

Hang on a minute – “I shot Gaddafi”– says this man –

Above full video at LiveLeak

Oh, hang on – hang on a bit longer! Just noticed this –

Above full video also at LiveLeak

You know something? I could write a song about this. “The Man Who Shot Colonel Gaddafi” has a certain ring to it, don’t you think?

After sorting that out (?!) – who shot the “mad dog” dictator of Libya –  I’ll get back to where I started.

TWEEPS

I had an interesting chat on Twitter on Friday afternoon about Gaddafi’s death.

Let me get a few things clear on my position right from the start.

  • I am no fan of Gaddafi’s.
  • I have no time for dictatorships; none whatsoever.
  • I have deep sympathy for ALL who were mistreated, killed, injured or damaged under Gaddafi’s rule.
  • I am a humanitarian interventionist.

I sincerely wish, though I am not all that hopeful, that the new Libya will find itself in a far better place now that Gaddafi has gone. At the same time I am mindful that not everyone felt they had suffered under his 42-year regime (see this video. Yes I know it’s propaganda, anti-west and all the rest but I notice that Libya looked not so bad not that long ago. And no-one forced passers-by to come out and cheer him.)

Sirte - BEFORE

Sirte - AFTER (spot the difference)

NOTHING QUESTIONED OUR VALUES WITH SUCH URGENT IMPACT THAN…

THE MANNER OF GADDAFI’S “GOING” AND OUR REACTION TO IT

Little about this historic week has concerned me as much as how Gaddafi met his bloody end.  In that concern I seem to be in a minority. We seem to have become immune to such horrors played out as they often are before our very eyes. We have become values-vacant comparative moralists. And worse, we have barely noticed the transformation.

Twisters of fact, truth and human rights – often anti-interventionist so-called liberals – have in reality few if any concerns regarding the universality of human rights.  You will notice this writ large even from the conversation I had at twitter some of which is pasted below.  But there is much more to confirm their confused values where that came from, believe me.

The twitter conversation started with my responding to a tweet which had mentioned Amnesty International critically. This is it –

Allie Ben-Hamida

@NurBHdm Allie Ben-Hamida
I thought societies like @AmnestyUK were supposed to be PROTECTING THE HUMAN?Calling for charges against a man who killed Gaddafi is not tht

I read and noted the response to the above from Amnesty International, which was –

Amnesty UK

@AmnestyUK Amnesty UK
@NurBHdm A society can be judged by how it treats its prisoners. Killing Gaddafi sets a dangerous precedent for the NTC

I tweeted this back –

Blair Supporter

@blairsupporter Blair Supporter
@AmnestyUK – Quite. And the international society too, for, surely, willing the end? @NurBHdm #Gaddafi #murdered

Note that my concern here in a 140-character-limited tweet was how the international community has behaved.  It is not by any means the only thing that concerns me, though the British media have been all but mute in (lack of) outcry as have most British MPs as they watched, like the rest of us, Gaddafi’s bloody ending.  We should also note that it didn’t take the “protectors of the Libyan people” – Britain, France, USA and others under the NATO/UNSC mandate long to get the hell out of there. They are off on Monday even though the Libyan NTC has asked them to stay. Job done. Or so it would seem.

I see backs protecting backs, but not necessarily Libyan backs.

This is an example of how the twitter conversation went later on in the chat stream.

Blair Supporter

@blairsupporter Blair Supporter
@politaire – & that may well be a mitigating factor in court. I take exception to the big “NO” re Gaddafi’s rights. @PrinceSarah @NurBHdm

DID THE TWEEPS SUPPORTING THE GADDAFI KILLER(S) LIE or what?

DO THEY HAVE THEIR OWN ‘TRUTH’ TO DEFEND?

Throughout this chat I was repeatedly informed by some – at least one of whom is a Libyan – that the “boy” who did this – (and they seemed to have no concerns about the man who sodomized Gaddafi) –  was a “boy” whose actions should be understood.  Not one of my chatty friends raised any doubt that it was a 17 year-old killer, therefore, presumably below the age of criminal responsibility in Libya.  There was a repeated contention that this “boy” was the victim, not the man who died, bloodied, sexually abused and shot in the brain. Perhaps the videos at the top of this page will cast light (or even questions) on their alibi.

I do not find it easy to conclude that my co-tweeps were unaware that others had also claimed to have killed Gaddafi. Their argument, if they were aware, tells of an agenda which is so utterly reprehensible as to be almost unreal.

Their argument, possibly based on a false ‘underage’ premise, went like this:

  • the killer was just a boy.  If he’d been a few months older, it would have been different (?)
  • he had been brutalised himself under Gaddafi’s rule
  • he may have seen countless merciless murders, of family or friends
  • his “revenge” was justifiable

All very well and understandable. Except that notwithstanding the possibility that the ‘boy’ was not the killer, it raises umpteen questions.

For instance:

Knowing that the “rebels” were a ragtag bunch of testosterone-laden hyper males (seen any females involved in this revolution?) why did the Libya NTC and/or the NATO-led alliance seem to will the ends without limiting the means?

As regulars here will likely know I have never been convinced about the rightness of the Libyan intervention. Forgive me my scepticism but I have yet to be persuaded that it had much to do with protecting the Libyan people.  I still see it as David Cameron wishing to show that he could do international humanitarian intervention “legally”, in comparison to Tony Blair who some still contend participated in the Iraq intervention “illegally”. To contrast and compare – note that Blair kept to the task in hand in Iraq despite its almost complete destruction of his political authority, even integrity. That was press-inspired destruction of course.

There is much more that I could write on the press’s take on Gaddafi’s death murder and our reaction to it.  I may do so. But PLEASE – we cannot “do” human rights selectively. As with defending the rights of all to freedom of speech we MUST defend the rights of all humans to humane treatment.

If  human rights are to mean anything at all they must apply to all people.  No exceptions. Otherwise Amnesty UK might as well pack up and forget it. They need have few fears. Other organisations will soon pop up to protect such as Binyam Mohammed. We already have so-called Liberty, specifically intended to speak up for many who would do us harm.

But all leaders, politicians and those who put themselves in the political firing line WILL have fears in the unlikely circumstance of Amnesty’s demise.

Note what this commenter said at Peter Popham’s disgraceful, hand-wringing and sadly typical ‘liberal’ article at The Independent

“If only Tony Balir[sic] was with Gaddafi at the time !

The world would have been cleansed of two evils ! “

Also note that that comment had 24 ‘recommends’.

And some wonder why I do this blogging in support of Blair

Back to top

Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

_______________

Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

Recent comments:

I am staggered by all the hate directed towards our former Prime Minister. I believe that Tony Blair made the Iraq decision in good faith and is most certainly NOT a war criminal. If anyone should be tried at the Hague it should be those in the media for totally misrepresenting the information and facts. The media are to blame for fuelling this hatred as it is purely driven by them. (UK)

__________
The greatest and most successful leader the Labour Party has ever had with the courage to fight the Islamist terrorists who really would like to kill us all, and you never hear a good word about him. The herd of independent minds, commentators, activists etc who have never had to make a difficult decision in their lives drown out all debate with their inane chants of war crimes and blood on his hands. Defend him at every chance. I just wish more people would do it. (Glasgow, UK)
__________
Blair was the greatest Labour Prime Minister. It is a disgrace that the party has turned away from his legacy. Shame on Ed Miliband and his so-called ‘new generation’.

Pat McFadden MP on Humanitarian Intervention post-Iraq (video)

October 27, 2011

Comment at end

Or –

28th October 2011

This video is a few years old.  It was of a meeting just a few weeks before Tony Blair left office in 2007.  It is still worth a listen.  Perhaps, since the Libya intervention – which has come to a sudden – in my opinion too sudden – stop, it is even more valid than then.

Following the Iraq invasion far too many critics were determined to prove that intervention is seldom “humanitarian”. Rather it was seen as realpolitik or for even more questionable motives.  The world has in reality quietly moved onto the ground that Tony Blair charted in 1999 in his Chicago speech on Humanitarian Intervention, albeit with a firm eye skewed towards the UNSC, despite its many shortcomings and frequent inability and/or unwillingness to act.

__________

Euston Manifesto: Humanitarian Intervention post-Iraq (1/8)

Uploaded by on 3 May 2007

On Monday 30th April 2007, a panel of leading Ministers, MPs, and thinkers came together in the Houses of Parliament to discuss the future of humanitarian intervention, after the conflict in Iraq.

Discussion topics included the recent crisis in both Darfur and also Somalia, the failure of the Left to deal with the arguments surrounding the promotion of democracy and international law, and the future for intervention.

The speakers were: –

Rt. Hon. Hilary Benn MP, the Secretary of State for International Development and a candidate for the Labour party deputy leadership.

Prof. Brian Brivati, Professor of Contemporary History and Human Rights at Kingston University.

Nick Cohen, journalist for the Observer and New Statesman, and author of ‘What’s Left? How Liberals lost their way’.

Brendan Cox, Director of Crisis Action and co-organiser of Day for Darfur.

Gary Kent, Director of Labour Friends of Iraq.

Pat McFadden MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Cabinet Office

The meeting was chaired by:

Karen Pollock, Chief Executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust.

This is clip 1/8, all clips are available on youtube.com/eustonmanifesto

__________

RELATED

TIME CHART – Responsibility to Protect

2009 – September 14th – International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect

2008 – 15th July – UN, SECRETARY-GENERAL DEFENDS, CLARIFIES ‘RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT’ AT BERLIN EVENT

2005 World Summit – Responsibility to Protect in the United Nations

At the 2005 World Summit, Member States included RtoP in the Outcome Document agreeing to Paragraphs 138 and 139. These paragraphs gave final language to the scope of RtoP (i.e. it applies to the four crimes only) and to whom the responsibility actually falls (i.e. nations first, regional and international communities second).

1999 – April 22nd– Chicago Economic Club – Tony Blair’s Doctrine of Intervention

Speaking before the Chicago Economic Club, British Prime Minister Tony Blair unveiled his “Doctrine of the International Community”. Among other things, the doctrine outlines circumstances that warrant the international community to intervene in the affairs of other nations.

Back to top

Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

_______________

Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

Recent comments:

I am staggered by all the hate directed towards our former Prime Minister. I believe that Tony Blair made the Iraq decision in good faith and is most certainly NOT a war criminal. If anyone should be tried at the Hague it should be those in the media for totally misrepresenting the information and facts. The media are to blame for fuelling this hatred as it is purely driven by them. (UK)

__________
The greatest and most successful leader the Labour Party has ever had with the courage to fight the Islamist terrorists who really would like to kill us all, and you never hear a good word about him. The herd of independent minds, commentators, activists etc who have never had to make a difficult decision in their lives drown out all debate with their inane chants of war crimes and blood on his hands. Defend him at every chance. I just wish more people would do it. (Glasgow, UK)
__________
Blair was the greatest Labour Prime Minister. It is a disgrace that the party has turned away from his legacy. Shame on Ed Miliband and his so-called ‘new generation’.

Telegraph should shut up about Tony Blair, says admirer Ahmed M Kamara

October 10, 2011

Comment at end

Or –

10th October 2011

I saw this the other day and felt refreshed. Cleansed even.  And by a journalist. A real, live journalist – without the ugly look-at-clever-me appendage most of the British variety drag around on their shoulder hanging putridly off the cynicism chip.

The article is by Ahmed M Kamura at Newstime Africa.  It refers to this at The Telegraph by Richard Eden.  Apart from the main thrust of the article – praising the work of “this wonderful statesman” it also takes on our disgraceful, self-debased media, including broadcasting media as exemplified by Peter Oborne’s [possibly libellous] junk on Channel 4 Dispatches recently.

Our printed press, mainly The Telegraph on this occasion (but there are many others, as we all know) takes most of the criticism. Well deserved, imho.

Mr Kamura’s article is cross-posted below, with my sincere thanks to him.

____________________

Britain’s Telegraph newspaper should shut up – Tony Blair is doing a fantastic job in Africa!

Tony Blair receives Golden Jubilee Award from Sierra Leone President Ernest Koroma

Not a week passes by that the British press doesn’t take a jab at the former Prime Minister Tony Blair. For one reason or another, the continuous hounding has become  a standard that the press here believes will guarantee them sales. The relentless attacks have become like a cult thing where it has to be done come what may. There’s never a talk about the amazing contribution that this hardworking former Prime Minister has made to Britain and the world in general. The Iraq war has become synonymous of a man whose achievements should be the envy of most current world leaders. But sadly, the British press that is supposed to elevate his profile in the media, are the ones who are taking turns in trashing the reputation of this fine international public servant. So what – he took British forces to war in Iraq on what the media here says was based on flawed intelligence – is that reason enough to continue to bash his image in the media? British newspapers need to move on. Blair’s era as PM has ended. Apparently, it seems they wish he was still Prime Minister as his presence at Number 10 helped them sell tons of papers – reflecting how popular Blair was to the British people.

The British media is notorious for hyping unnecessary issues – and as the recent phone hacking scandal has revealed – they would go through extra-ordinary means to secure damaging material on anyone they deem could make good gossip, and then embark on destroying their reputation – with no remorse. It is indeed disgraceful that respectable journalists would engage in such rancor – when they should instigate debate on how to help make the British society better for all. But i guess that doesn’t sell newspapers – not a viable commercial effort – as morals are thrown out of the window in place of dishing garbage to sometimes unsuspecting readers.

The British press is passionate about anything Blair. Recently, a TV documentary by a former broadsheet journalist actually went out of its way to investigate the business dealings of Tony Blair – just to find any flaws in the way he manages his charity and other work – when in fact no one has complained!!  No one is talking about the impact Blair’s work is having in places like Liberia, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone – where remarkable success is being made in how the people are governed. This sadly, would never make it to the front pages of British newspapers. The obsession to trash Blair’s reputation is second only to the scandal that has engulfed the corrupt British press establishment itself. I believe that the fascination with Blair stems from the fact that most in the media were hoping to see his demise after he left office – and the remarkable success he has made both with his charity and his work as Quartet Envoy has left some in shock – as most were looking forward to Blair’s downfall and use every opportunity to write vile things about this wonderful statesman – but now they have to contend with the outstanding success of a man who continues to use his world-class leadership stature in the international arena.

I have lived in Britain long enough to know how some in the press operate. Being a Journalist myself – i have seen how some credible newspapers have fallen far short of their moral obligations. I have also seen how the tenets of the profession is totally disregarded by tabloid newspaper and their journalists –  just to ensure a controversial headline. On May 13th 2007 when Tony Blair was leaving office, the reputable New York Times reported “ there is no denying the political brilliance that won Blair rare longevity as prime minister. He refashioned the Labour Party after years in the political wilderness, molding a British version of Bill Clinton’s third way – a cleverly packaged balancing of Margaret Thatcher’s free-market policies with a willingness to spend revenues from a booming economy on hospitals, schools and public safety. Blair deserves the praise he has received for achieving peace in Northern Ireland, for the creation of separate legislatures in Scotland and Wales, and for overcoming his Tory predecessors’ knee-jerk hostility to the European Union. Blair sagely dispensed with British insularity when he backed the EU expansion that brought in Central European countries of the vanished Soviet bloc. And he rightly preached a policy of building a strong Europe that would not weaken the trans-Atlantic alliance”.  This is indeed an excellent assessment of some of Blair’s achievements – the type that will never make it to the OP/ED’s of British newspapers!!

On the 9th October edition of the British Telegraph, it is reported: “Tony Blair’s charity set up to alleviate poverty in Africa spends more than £1.6 million on its staff” – I don’t personally see anything wrong with this. If Blair was paying his staff peanuts or below the British minimum wage. I wonder what the headlines would be! These nasty behavior from newspapers that are supposed to be respectable, exposes a daft agenda that comes into play when there is insufficient material to make it to the next edition. The deliberate cocked-up attempt to create a story out of nothing relevant could easily be identified in the flow of the story itself. The report went on:  “It paid its 22 employees, seven secondees and sub-contractors a total of more than £1.6 million. This translates as more than £57,000 a year for each of Blair’s staff. The charity works in some of the world’s poorest countries, including Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Rwanda. The organisation, which is one of three charities the former prime minister set up since leaving office, enjoyed an income of £3.2 million in 2010, an increase of £1.25 million since 2009. Its expenditure was almost £3 million”. The article is clearly meant to cause damage to Blair’s credibility. There must be better things to write about – especially considering the current phone hacking scandal that has engulfed the British media.

Tony Blair should be left alone to help  African governments deliver good governance to their people. The continued harassment Blair has endured in the hands of the press in Britain has now become tasteless in the minds of newspaper readers who have become accustomed to see a story or two about him on the front or inner pages of newspapers nearly every week. The Telegraph’s latest attempt to smear him has only ended up chipping into the credibility of this media house I once had respect and admiration for. No matter what is written, Tony Blair has left a legacy, one that would be impossible to dismantle – no matter how mighty the pen is!!

____________________

RELATED POSTS from NewsTime Africa

Tony Blair - Commitment to Africa

Former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, today (Monday 22nd February 2010) started a two-day visit to Liberia in order to launch a new project between his Africa Governance …

READ MORE

Tony Blair -  The Quartet Envoy

It has come to the knowledge of this press that a certain unscrupulous Media Editor has started a smear campaign to tarnish the good reputation of the former British Prime …

READ MORE

Tony Blair with President Koroma

Sierra Leone couldn’t ask for a better friend than the one the country has in the former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair. Even before he left office at Number 10, …

READ MORE

Tony Blair with Sierra Leone's President Ernest Bai Koroma

Tony Blair has called for African development strategies to go beyond aid. According to the former British Prime Minister, predictable and transparent business environment was critical to sustainable development. Tony …

READ MORE

Tony Blair’s Love for Africa is deep-rooted in his belief that the continent has a lot to offer to the world and the time is right for all to discover …

READ MORE

__________

I commented at Mr Kamara’s article here and tweeted on it here –

blairsupporterBlair Supporter
Ahmed M Kamara, I salute you, Sir. We need your sort of honest journalism here in UK. newstimeafrica.com/archives/22802  – Tony Blair “wonderful statesman”

__________

MORE EXAMPLES OF THE TELEGRAPH’S CAMPAIGN OF ENVIOUS VITRIOL TOWARDS TONY BLAIR

__________

Also see – Tony Blair’s Africa Governance Initiative – AGI

______

Back to top

Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

_______________

Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

Recent comments:

I am staggered by all the hate directed towards our former Prime Minister. I believe that Tony Blair made the Iraq decision in good faith and is most certainly NOT a war criminal. If anyone should be tried at the Hague it should be those in the media for totally misrepresenting the information and facts. The media are to blame for fuelling this hatred as it is purely driven by them. (UK)

__________
The greatest and most successful leader the Labour Party has ever had with the courage to fight the Islamist terrorists who really would like to kill us all, and you never hear a good word about him. The herd of independent minds, commentators, activists etc who have never had to make a difficult decision in their lives drown out all debate with their inane chants of war crimes and blood on his hands. Defend him at every chance. I just wish more people would do it. (Glasgow, UK)
__________
Blair was the greatest Labour Prime Minister. It is a disgrace that the party has turned away from his legacy. Shame on Ed Miliband and his so-called ‘new generation’.

BREAKING: Ban ki-moon, H Clinton, Ashton & Lavrov forced to stand down (Quartet)

October 3, 2011

Comment at end

Or –

3rd October 2011

[*See note at end]

In a move that has shocked the international community all four representatives of the international Quartet working for peace between Israel and the Palestinians agreed unanimously to stand down from their decision-making positions as regards the Middle East’s most intractable problem.  It is believed to be connected with reported opinion of some on the Palestinian side that they consider Tony Blair to be “biased” against the Palestinians.

The UN’s Ban Ki-moon, US Sec of State Hilary Clinton, the EU’s Baroness Ashton and Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov explained their reasons in a joint statement:

“In the light of reported Palestinian and press outrage over Tony Blair’s so-called failure to transform Palestine into Norway over the last four-year period, despite its never having been Norway for at least the last 60, we thought it more principled on this occasion NOT to shoot the messenger. We realise we four will be missed by the international community, but we decided it was for the best.  Mr Blair, it should be noted, has made more inroads into his job description than any of us have with ours. Apart from that the rest of us have elections to win and Mr Blair doesn’t. So he can take the flak.”

NOT SHOOTING THE MESSENGER

In response to this the Quartet’s representative Tony Blair said, “It is a relief they have decided NOT to shoot the messenger. I have enough trouble back home at Labour Party conferences where they have a noose with my name on it.  And that’s only because some Conservatives seem to quite like me.”

Just a few reasons Tony Blair survives, while others don’t or perhaps shouldn’t –

RELATED

Quartet on the Middle East (Wikipedia)

The Quartet on the Middle East, sometimes called the Diplomatic Quartet or Madrid Quartet or simply the Quartet, is a foursome of nations and international and supranational entities involved in mediating the peace process in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Quartet are the United Nations, the United States, the European Union, and Russia. The group was established in Madrid in 2002, recalling Madrid Conference of 1991, as a result of the escalating conflict in the Middle East. Tony Blair is the Quartet’s current Special Envoy.

Ban Ki-moon (Wikipedia)

*NOTE:

This report is entirely fictional, just in case you wondered!

NOT RELATED TO ANYTHING SENSIBLE –

Debunking Peter Oborne, C4 and the rest of the Tony Blair debunkers

Back to top

Click to Buy Tony Blair’s ‘A Journey’

_______________

Sign the Ban Blair-Baiting petition here

Recent comments:

I am staggered by all the hate directed towards our former Prime Minister. I believe that Tony Blair made the Iraq decision in good faith and is most certainly NOT a war criminal. If anyone should be tried at the Hague it should be those in the media for totally misrepresenting the information and facts. The media are to blame for fuelling this hatred as it is purely driven by them. (UK)

__________
The greatest and most successful leader the Labour Party has ever had with the courage to fight the Islamist terrorists who really would like to kill us all, and you never hear a good word about him. The herd of independent minds, commentators, activists etc who have never had to make a difficult decision in their lives drown out all debate with their inane chants of war crimes and blood on his hands. Defend him at every chance. I just wish more people would do it. (Glasgow, UK)
__________
Blair was the greatest Labour Prime Minister. It is a disgrace that the party has turned away from his legacy. Shame on Ed Miliband and his so-called ‘new generation’.